My PR to squelch the seemingly new tests passes travis. Unless
someone strongly protests, I will merge it later this afternoon so we
can get back to our normally scheduled testing.
If we want to discuss turning some of the tests back on we can have
that discussion later.
Tom
On Thu, Mar 27, 201
At any rate, I have a PR (#2930) that should make it pass cleanly again.
On the bright side, it looks like one of the changes is 1.5 is that
long unbreakable lines will get ignored by E501 so urls are safe
again.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Paul Ivanov wrote:
> Nelle Varoquaux, on 2014-03
Nelle Varoquaux, on 2014-03-26 21:27, wrote:
> > Does anyone know why we are seeing a huge number of PEP 8 failures now?
> > It looks to me like it is a change in which modules are subject to the
> > test, or in which tests are grounds for failure. I don't know how all
> > this is set up, thoug
> Does anyone know why we are seeing a huge number of PEP 8 failures now?
> It looks to me like it is a change in which modules are subject to the
> test, or in which tests are grounds for failure. I don't know how all
> this is set up, though.
>
If it started very recently, it could be linked
Does anyone know why we are seeing a huge number of PEP 8 failures now?
It looks to me like it is a change in which modules are subject to the
test, or in which tests are grounds for failure. I don't know how all
this is set up, though.
Eric
-
