Michael Droettboom wrote:
John Hunter wrote:
log_demo.py 1.769 2.011 0.242113%
Here is another area where there is an important difference. Panning
and zooming interactively with log scaling is much slower on the
branch, presumably because you have to r
Thought some of you may be interested to know that the speed on the
branch is getting much better. Whereas earlier the branch was about 2x
slower than the trunk, now most things are close to equal with the trunk
speed-wise (with a few outliers for some things such as auto legends,
quivers and
John Hunter wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2007 1:51 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Very odd. I've been running my own very similar benchmark as I've been
>> going, and the two code bases perform quite similarly. The branch
>> continues to cache the markers in more or less the same
On Nov 15, 2007 1:51 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very odd. I've been running my own very similar benchmark as I've been
> going, and the two code bases perform quite similarly. The branch
> continues to cache the markers in more or less the same way as on the
> trunk. He
John Hunter wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2007 12:53 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Thought some of you may be interested to know that the speed on the
>> branch is getting much better. Whereas earlier the branch was about 2x
>> slower than the trunk, now most things are close to eq
On Nov 15, 2007 12:53 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thought some of you may be interested to know that the speed on the
> branch is getting much better. Whereas earlier the branch was about 2x
> slower than the trunk, now most things are close to equal with the trunk
> speed
