Stacked type histograms have this problem as well. The solution I've
found is to do fig.set_yscale('log', nonposy='clip').
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Eric Firing wrote:
>>
>> On 2012/08/23 6:41 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>> > Hi Er
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Eric Firing wrote:
> On 2012/08/23 6:41 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> >> I'm not sure I understand what you are getting at, but I don't think
> there
> >> should be any interface changes for p
On 2012/08/23 6:41 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>> I'm not sure I understand what you are getting at, but I don't think there
>> should be any interface changes for plot or for their log variants.
>
> I probably phrased my question po
Hi Eric,
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand what you are getting at, but I don't think there
> should be any interface changes for plot or for their log variants.
I probably phrased my question poorly. I'm just wondering, how would
one use the propos
I think this gives more reason to not add a stacked kwarg to plot. You
would need to add it to the log variants as well.
Nic
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> On 2012/08/23 2:54 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>>> OK, here ar
On 2012/08/23 2:54 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>> OK, here are mine: I oppose overloading plot with a "stacked" kwarg and
>> functionality. It is complicated enough as it is. I don't see any
>> problem with having "stackplot" and hist(..., stac
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> OK, here are mine: I oppose overloading plot with a "stacked" kwarg and
> functionality. It is complicated enough as it is. I don't see any
> problem with having "stackplot" and hist(..., stacked=True). They are
> just not all that similar.
Eric, you make a good point. I'm okay with that approach as well. It
also has the benefit of being the least work.
Nic
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> On 2012/08/23 11:55 AM, Damon McDougall wrote:
>> Hey Nic,
>>
>> Thanks for bringing this up. I was the author for #819, so
On 2012/08/23 11:55 AM, Damon McDougall wrote:
> Hey Nic,
>
> Thanks for bringing this up. I was the author for #819, so I'd like to
> get some dicussion going on this, too. Sorry for the delay, I was in the
> midst of writing a thesis, which I am now free of.
>
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:51:24PM
Hey Nic,
Thanks for bringing this up. I was the author for #819, so I'd like to
get some dicussion going on this, too. Sorry for the delay, I was in the
midst of writing a thesis, which I am now free of.
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:51:24PM -0500, Nic Eggert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to bring
Oops, sorry. I realized it was actually Ben Root who suggested I start this
discussion. Don't want to put words in anyones mouth.
Nic
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Nic Eggert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to bring up a question spurred by PRs #847(mine) and #819
> (recently accepted). These
Hi all,
I'd like to bring up a question spurred by PRs #847(mine) and #819
(recently accepted). These PRs both deal with stacked plots. #819 adds the
stackplot function to axes.py as a new function, which plots different 2-d
datasets stacked atop each other. #847 slightly modifies the functioning
12 matches
Mail list logo
