Mark Bakker wrote:
> I agree that the new logo looks nice, but I also think that
> Rob is right: When you see the logo you wouldn't know that
> we are talking about a general purpose plotting package.
> So the question is: are we going for looks over meaning?
> I guess the other way around would be
I agree that the new logo looks nice, but I also think that
Rob is right: When you see the logo you wouldn't know that
we are talking about a general purpose plotting package.
So the question is: are we going for looks over meaning?
I guess the other way around would be terrible: choosing
meaning o
