John Hunter wrote:
>>"Eric" == Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Eric> Based on a quick look, I think it would be easy to make
> Eric> LineCollection and PolyCollection accept a numerix array in
> Eric> place of [(x,y), (x,y), ...] for each line segment or
> Eric>
On 6/15/06, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How often does it come up that we want a homogeneous line collection,
> ie a bunch of lines segments with the same properties (color,
> linewidth...)?
Hi,
for b&w PS publication quality plotting, this must be a common thing to draw;
contour line
> "Eric" == Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eric> Based on a quick look, I think it would be easy to make
Eric> LineCollection and PolyCollection accept a numerix array in
Eric> place of [(x,y), (x,y), ...] for each line segment or
Eric> polygon; specifically, this coul
Eric Firing wrote:
> Jordan,
>
> I understand what you wrote. I am a bit worried about the amount of
> complexity it would add to the collection code, however, and it seems
> like it would be useful only in quite special situations--and in those
> situations, there may be reasonable alternative
I have one suggestion, slightly off-topic, and I'm not sure how useful
it would be: you might think about making LineCollection accept a 3-D
numerix array. This came up for me while I was looking at turning the
quiver arrows into line segments. As I understand it (and as the
documentation say
Based on a quick look, I think it would be easy to make LineCollection
and PolyCollection accept a numerix array in place of [(x,y), (x,y),
...] for each line segment or polygon; specifically, this could replaced
by an N x 2 array, where the first column would be x and the second
would be y. B
