On 2009-07-09 23:19, Andrew Straw wrote:
> Erik Tollerud wrote:
>> 2. Installation of traits or traitsgui should not be a necessity for
>> MPL... perhaps this will change in the future, but it's currently a
>> far bigger task to get traits and traits UI working on an arbitrary
>> system than it is
Erik Tollerud wrote:
> Personally, I think traits must be kept out of MPL, for three main reasons:
>
As these comments are in respose to my email, let me again state the
main point of my email:
My main feeling about MPL is that there's just too much layout happening to
keep using the non-syst
Personally, I think traits must be kept out of MPL, for three main reasons:
1. As Eric Bruning points out, while traits is a very powerful tool,
it also closes a lot of doors by forcing everything to be written in a
trait-like fashion for it to play nice with everything else. While
this is great
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Andrew Straw wrote:
> Gael Varoquaux wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 08:39:30AM -0500, John Hunter wrote:
>>
>>> Anyone interested? And if so, feel free to suggest topics or weigh in
>>> on some I listed.
>>>
>>
>> Actually, I have something I would like to discus
Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 08:39:30AM -0500, John Hunter wrote:
>
>> Anyone interested? And if so, feel free to suggest topics or weigh in
>> on some I listed.
>>
>
> Actually, I have something I would like to discuss, but never really
> could pull myself together to d
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 08:39:30AM -0500, John Hunter wrote:
> Anyone interested? And if so, feel free to suggest topics or weigh in
> on some I listed.
Actually, I have something I would like to discuss, but never really
could pull myself together to do it. I don't have time right now, but I
am
