On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 5:23 AM, David Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have committed to SVN the change making twinx work like twiny. As an
> aside, this would not be necessary if there was an easy after the fact
> way of sharing and unsharing axes (i.e., ax.set_shared_x_axes(ax2)).
Yes, t
Hi,
I just noticed a bug in twinx/twiny in axes.py. twinx has:
ax2 = self.figure.add_axes(self.get_position(True), # sharex=self,
frameon=False)
while twiny has:
ax2 = self.figure.add_axes(self.get_position(True), sharey=self,
frameon=False)
Therefore t
