Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc available for testing, building

2011/1/4 Russell E. Owen : > I'm not sure what to do about 64-bit Python 2.7. It does not even > support Mac OS X 10.5 due to tcl/tk issues that I think were resolved > too late for python 2.7.1. In my opinion a matplotlib built against > ActiveState's Python 2.7 (which is 64-bit and supports 10.5

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc available for testing, building

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: >> >>> Not sure if this should hold the release but 1.0.1rc fails to run two >>> examples (contourf_log.py and pcolor_log.py

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc available for testing, building

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > >> Not sure if this should hold the release but 1.0.1rc fails to run two >> examples (contourf_log.py and pcolor_log.py) as described in bug >> #3143748 "Math domain error in ticker

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc available for testing, building

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > Not sure if this should hold the release but 1.0.1rc fails to run two > examples (contourf_log.py and pcolor_log.py) as described in bug > #3143748 "Math domain error in ticker.py is_decade()" > < > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=de

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc available for testing, building

Not sure if this should hold the release but 1.0.1rc fails to run two examples (contourf_log.py and pcolor_log.py) as described in bug #3143748 "Math domain error in ticker.py is_decade()" Christoph On 1/5/201

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc available for testing, building

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > > Could you please give your opinion on the documentation & > example.download issue on the other thread? > > Thanks for the reminder. I commented in the other thread. JDH

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc available for testing, building

Hi John. On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 14:36, John Hunter wrote: > OK, I'm not aware of any outstanding issues that should hold this release. > If there are any, please let me know, else I'll upload the final later > today. Could you please give your opinion on the documentation & example.download issu

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc available for testing, building

OK, I'm not aware of any outstanding issues that should hold this release. If there are any, please let me know, else I'll upload the final later today. On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Michiel de Hoon wrote: > Done. > > Thanks, > --Michiel. > > ---

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc available for testing, building

Done. Thanks, --Michiel. --- On Tue, 1/4/11, John Hunter wrote: Michiel, can you review this and if it looks good contribute it to the 1.0.1 branch? http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/devel/coding_guide.html#version-control Thanks, JDH --

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc available for testing, building

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Derek Homeier < de...@astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de> wrote: > > > With the 64-bit installation on 10.6 I encountered a problem discussed a > few months > ago on the list, due to the MacOS module being removed from standard 64-bit > Python > builds (and being genera

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc available for testing, building

On 04.01.2011, at 1:49AM, Russell E. Owen wrote: I have uploaded Mac installers for python.org Python 2.6 and 32-bit Python 2.7. I'm not sure what to do about 64-bit Python 2.7. It does not even support Mac OS X 10.5 due to tcl/tk issues that I think were resolved too late for python 2.7.1. In

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc available for testing, building

On 01/03/2011 02:49 PM, Russell E. Owen wrote: > > I have uploaded Mac installers for python.org Python 2.6 and 32-bit > Python 2.7. > > I'm not sure what to do about 64-bit Python 2.7. It does not even > support Mac OS X 10.5 due to tcl/tk issues that I think were resolved > too late for python 2

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc available for testing, building

In article , John Hunter wrote: > We are long overdue on getting a bugfix release of 1.0.0 out, so I have > uploaded an rc for testing at > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.0.1/ > > Christoph and Russell -- if you have time could you build win32 and

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc available for testing, building

On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Russell Owen wrote: > The news: > - The Mac binary installer for python.org Python 2.6 works on my Mac OS X > 10.4 and 10.5 machines (both Intel). However, it segfaults on my 10.6 > machine if there is no existing ~/.matplotlib and ~/.fontconfig. If others > could

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc available for testing, building

The news: - The Mac binary installer for python.org Python 2.6 works on my Mac OS X 10.4 and 10.5 machines (both Intel). However, it segfaults on my 10.6 machine if there is no existing ~/.matplotlib and ~/.fontconfig. If others could test this it would be most helpful. I have not yet trie

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc available for testing, building

I just build and uploaded a version for python 2.6. I have tested it on Intel 10.4 and plan to test it on 10.5 and 10.6 before trying to build a version for 32-bit Python 2.7. I will keep you posted. Regards, -- Russell On Jan 2, 2011, at 9:52 AM, John Hunter wrote: We are long overdue on

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc available for testing, building

On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:52 AM, John Hunter wrote: > > > In sf, we used to be able to tag a file as the preferred file for a given > OS, but in the new file manager interface I no longer see a way to do this, > so that for example the rc files don't show up as the default download > options.

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc available for testing, building

On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 00:21, Ben Gamari wrote: > On Sun, 2 Jan 2011 23:25:12 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> Maybe I just missed them, but I can't find in the tarball the data >> files needed to run the examples without internet connection. I >> thought it was decided to ship them directly in the t

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc available for testing, building

On Sun, 2 Jan 2011 23:25:12 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Maybe I just missed them, but I can't find in the tarball the data > files needed to run the examples without internet connection. I > thought it was decided to ship them directly in the tarball and so use > the examples.directory rc option t

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc available for testing, building

On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 23:50, John Hunter wrote: > I just added a sample data release file to the same dir -- > mpl_sampledata-1.0.1rc.tar.gz - different tarball, but should contain > everything you need.  Will this meet Debian's requirements?  We could add it > to the main tarball, but part of th

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc available for testing, building

On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.0.1/ > > > Maybe I just missed them, but I can't find in the tarball the data > files needed to run the examples without internet connection. I > thought it was dec

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc available for testing, building

Hi John, On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 18:52, John Hunter wrote: > We are long overdue on getting a bugfix release of 1.0.0 out, so I have > uploaded an rc for testing at > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.0.1/ Maybe I just missed them, but I can't find in the

[matplotlib-devel] matplotlib 1.0.1rc available for testing, building

We are long overdue on getting a bugfix release of 1.0.0 out, so I have uploaded an rc for testing at https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.0.1/ Christoph and Russell -- if you have time could you build win32 and OSX binaries for testing as well. I don't belie