Michael Droettboom wrote:
>
> Improved consistency is a good thing. And ANSI is a sane choice
> (even though my muscle memory knows K&R, I'm willing to fight against
> that for the betterment of the whole... just don't be surprised if I
> screw some things up initially ;).
>
> I do have one con
Improved consistency is a good thing. And ANSI is a sane choice (even though
my muscle memory knows K&R, I'm willing to fight against that for the
betterment of the whole... just don't be surprised if I screw some things up
initially ;).
I do have one concern, however. It is very useful for m
Would anyone be displeased if I were to reformat all the extension code
in ansi style? See http://astyle.sourceforge.net/astyle.html.
Personally, I find the present hodge-podge of styles, and the
usually-but-not-always 2-space indentation, hard to read and work with;
I am much more comfortable
