On Dec 1, 2007 12:03 PM, Charlie Moad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for the delay. Apparently at some point the mingw compiler
> became default, and it was giving me problems since I was trying to
> build with the VS libpng and freetype. All binaries are posted now.
> Jon, you should pr
Sorry for the delay. Apparently at some point the mingw compiler
became default, and it was giving me problems since I was trying to
build with the VS libpng and freetype. All binaries are posted now.
Jon, you should probably send the announcement since I am a little out
of touch with the ch
On Nov 29, 2007 7:45 PM, Charlie Moad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So here's my plan. I just got an iMac a few weeks ago and I had to
> spend a little time getting parallels setup with VS2003... yada yada
> yada. I plan on cutting a 0.91.1 release tomorrow followed shortly by
> windows and mac bu
So here's my plan. I just got an iMac a few weeks ago and I had to
spend a little time getting parallels setup with VS2003... yada yada
yada. I plan on cutting a 0.91.1 release tomorrow followed shortly by
windows and mac builds. Hopefully nothing radical has snuck into the
svn tree since the 0.
Charlie Moad wrote:
> 2. Can anyone test this on 10.4?
> http://dev.imamuseum.org/~cmoad/matplotlib-0.91.0-py2.5-macosx-10.5-i386.egg
I downloaded this, and did:
$ easy_install matplotlib-0.91.0-py2.5-macosx-10.5-i386.egg
and got what I enclosed below.
The short version: it went and found t
My 1 year old only let me get the source release pushed last night and
build the mac release. I'll try to get the windows builds posted
tonight.
On Nov 28, 2007 8:23 AM, Rob Hetland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 28, 2007, at 12:03 AM, John Hunter wrote:
>
>
> > I think native tcl/tk is pr
On Nov 28, 2007, at 12:03 AM, John Hunter wrote:
> I think native tcl/tk is preferable, but this is not a terribly
> informed opinion. If you don't hear otherwise from someone else, just
> build under that assumption.
I am still having issues with Tk on my machine (native? version
8.4.7).
Before I push the OSX binary to SF I have 2 questions.
1. I used to be able to rename the file from "i386" to "fat" and have
it install on a ppc or intel machine. This doesn't seem to work
anymore even though this is a fat build. Any clues on how to approach
this?
2. Can anyone test this on 10
Charlie Moad wrote:
> - 0.91
> - numpy only
> - no wx compiled in (since 2.8 is pure python)
> - should tk use the default OSX installation for leopard?
> 10.5 comes with a working freetype, but I was still going to
> statically link it in for 10.4 users. It will be a FAT build.
sounds good to m
On Nov 27, 2007 5:00 PM, Charlie Moad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The last few builds for OSX I have done, somone (don't remember who)
> complained that I didn't build against ActiveTCL. I didn't know if
> others had a preference on this.
I think native tcl/tk is preferable, but this is not a te
The last few builds for OSX I have done, somone (don't remember who)
complained that I didn't build against ActiveTCL. I didn't know if
others had a preference on this.
- Charlie
On Nov 27, 2007 5:05 PM, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2007 2:05 PM, Charlie Moad <[EMAIL PROTE
On Nov 27, 2007 2:05 PM, Charlie Moad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To clarify
>
> - 0.91
> - numpy only
> - no wx compiled in (since 2.8 is pure python)
> - should tk use the default OSX installation for leopard?
Yes on the first three -- I am not sure what the last question is
referring to so
To clarify
- 0.91
- numpy only
- no wx compiled in (since 2.8 is pure python)
- should tk use the default OSX installation for leopard?
10.5 comes with a working freetype, but I was still going to
statically link it in for 10.4 users. It will be a FAT build.
- Charlie
On Nov 27, 2007 1:45
On Nov 26, 2007 5:42 PM, Charles Moad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ready whenever. I did a test 10.5 bulid a few days ago
> targeting 10.4 with the latest libpng and freetype statically linked
> in. All went pretty well. I'll write up build instructions similar
> to yours when I go through
Charles Moad wrote:
> Ready whenever. I did a test 10.5 bulid a few days ago
> targeting 10.4 with the latest libpng and freetype statically linked
> in.
Great!
A note about that -- I just built an app with Py2exe and delivered to
someone that then couldn't run it, 'cause it's linked
Ready whenever. I did a test 10.5 bulid a few days ago
targeting 10.4 with the latest libpng and freetype statically linked
in. All went pretty well. I'll write up build instructions similar
to yours when I go through the motions again.
- Charlie
On Nov 26, 2007, at 4:55 PM, John H
A couple of weeks ago we talked about doing a release, but with the
deluge of changes (stix fonts, site.cfg, and others) I thought it
might be a good idea to shake the tree for bugs. I think enough time
has elapsed since these changes went in that we should proceed with
the plan to release 0.91 if
17 matches
Mail list logo
