Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Paul Kienzle wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 09:51:54AM -0400, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Paul Kienzle wrote:
>>>
>>>
Thanks. It looks much better in png, but pdf has the subscript raised much
higher,
Paul Kienzle wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 09:51:54AM -0400, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>
>> Paul Kienzle wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks. It looks much better in png, but pdf has the subscript raised much
>>> higher,
>>>
>> That was a DPI-related bug, that is hopefully now fixed in SVN.
>>
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 09:51:54AM -0400, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Paul Kienzle wrote:
> >
> > Thanks. It looks much better in png, but pdf has the subscript raised much
> > higher,
> That was a DPI-related bug, that is hopefully now fixed in SVN.
> > and svg isn't rendering fonts at all (see
Paul Kienzle wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 08:38:02AM -0400, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>
>> Paul Kienzle wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The superscripts in mpl don't seem to be placed at the correct height for
>>> small fonts. The y-tics on the attached plot shows this. The effect is
>>> si
Paul Kienzle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The superscripts in mpl don't seem to be placed at the correct height for
> small fonts. The y-tics on the attached plot shows this. The effect is
> similar in svg and pdf backends.
>
Thanks. When looking up the x-height, the code was not taking the font
size in
Hi,
The superscripts in mpl don't seem to be placed at the correct height for
small fonts. The y-tics on the attached plot shows this. The effect is
similar in svg and pdf backends.
I'm using 0.91.2 because the latest svn version gives me a KeyError for
ufunc isfinite.
- Paul
<>--
