Re: [matplotlib-devel] wxMPL patch

2012-09-05 Thread Chris Barker
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Matt Newville wrote: > Sorry for the delay I also haven't done anything about this... yet? I > might be more gung-ho to fold this into my wxmplot, which is fairly similar, > but not exactly 1-to-1, and has some name overlaps with wxmpl. To be > clear, I'm

Re: [matplotlib-devel] wxMPL patch

2012-09-04 Thread Matt Newville
Hi Carlo, Sorry for the delay I also haven't done anything about this... yet? I might be more gung-ho to fold this into my wxmplot, which is fairly similar, but not exactly 1-to-1, and has some name overlaps with wxmpl. To be clear, I'm willing to refactor wxmplot to better accommodate mos

Re: [matplotlib-devel] wxMPL patch

2012-09-04 Thread Chris Barker
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Carlo Segre wrote: > Hi Chris: >> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Benjamin Root >> >>> AFAIK, no, it shouldn't be a problem. The question is where. I suspect >>> it >>> would fit best as a mpl_toolkit. >> >> >> yes -- I figured that was most likely. > Just a fol

Re: [matplotlib-devel] wxMPL patch

2012-05-01 Thread Thomas Kluyver
On 1 May 2012 17:26, Chris Barker wrote: > Would there be a problem bringing it in to MPL in that case? Not from the license point of view - the X11 license is another permissive BSD-style license. I was just furnishing that detail. ;-) Thomas ---

Re: [matplotlib-devel] wxMPL patch

2012-05-01 Thread Chris Barker
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Benjamin Root > AFAIK, no, it shouldn't be a problem.  The question is where.  I suspect it > would fit best as a mpl_toolkit. yes -- I figured that was most likely. > P.S. - Of course, you do realize that you are essentially making yourself > the de facto maintai

Re: [matplotlib-devel] wxMPL patch

2012-05-01 Thread Benjamin Root
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Thomas Kluyver > wrote: > > On 1 May 2012 17:04, Chris Barker wrote: > >> (the license looks BSD-ish to me) > > > > At a glance, I think it's the X11 license, aka MIT license. > > > Would there be a problem b

Re: [matplotlib-devel] wxMPL patch

2012-05-01 Thread Chris Barker
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > On 1 May 2012 17:04, Chris Barker wrote: >> (the license looks BSD-ish to me) > > At a glance, I think it's the X11 license, aka MIT license. Would there be a problem bringing it in to MPL in that case? -Chris -- Christopher Barker,

Re: [matplotlib-devel] wxMPL patch

2012-05-01 Thread Chris Barker
Hi folks, It seems Ken McIvor has more or less disappeared. However, his wxMPL code is still useful and there are a few of us that are interested in maintaining it. What would be the procedure for getting it into a more "official" location -- like maybe a matplotlib toolkit? Or even mixed right i