On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 01:49:19AM -0500, Robert Kern wrote:
> Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 04:54:49PM -1000, Eric Firing wrote:
> >> The 2.0 branch is not new enough, though; we need the trunk.
> > Nonononono. Believe me. Unless you want to live on the bleeding edge.
> > Al
Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 04:54:49PM -1000, Eric Firing wrote:
>> The 2.0 branch is not new enough, though; we need the trunk.
>
> Nonononono. Believe me. Unless you want to live on the bleeding edge. All
> the QA is done on the branches. The trunk is for active developemen
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 04:54:49PM -1000, Eric Firing wrote:
> The 2.0 branch is not new enough, though; we need the trunk.
Nonononono. Believe me. Unless you want to live on the bleeding edge. All
the QA is done on the branches. The trunk is for active developement
(some active developement hap
Bryce Hendrix wrote:
> John, you're trying to check out the code from Trac, not svn :) Try this
> URL
>
> https://svn.enthought.com/svn/enthought/branches/enthought.traits_2.0
I just did this. There is still an authentication problem, but manually
accepting the cert makes it work.
The 2.0 bra
