If we're going to use setuptools (actually already required for Python
2.3), I think we need to do it completely and not optionally --
otherwise users will start to depend on its features, which simply won't
be there in some cases. In particular, I suspect they will make use of
the dependency r
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 01:40:38PM -0500, Charlie Moad wrote:
> We added "setupegg.py" a long time ago which does exactly this. The
> line below would then be:
> python setupegg.py develop
Sorry. I am being really brain dead today.
Thanks,
Gaël
We added "setupegg.py" a long time ago which does exactly this. The
line below would then be:
python setupegg.py develop
On Dec 12, 2007 12:35 PM, Gael Varoquaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:32:04AM -0800, Andrew Straw wrote:
> > If we're going to use setuptools (actua
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:32:04AM -0800, Andrew Straw wrote:
> If we're going to use setuptools (actually already required for Python
> 2.3), I think we need to do it completely and not optionally --
> otherwise users will start to depend on its features, which simply won't
> be there in some c
