Re: [matplotlib-devel] John: Thoughts on a standard test system

2009-01-08 Thread Fernando Perez
Howdy, On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Drain, Theodore R wrote: > OK - nose it is. How do you want to handle the dependency? My opinion is > that since tests are development tools, it's not unreasonable to require that > nose be installed by the developer and not as an embedded dependency in

Re: [matplotlib-devel] John: Thoughts on a standard test system

2009-01-06 Thread John Hunter
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Drain, Theodore R wrote: > OK - nose it is. How do you want to handle the dependency? My opinion is > that since tests are development tools, it's not unreasonable to require that > nose be installed by the developer and not as an embedded dependency in MPL > (

Re: [matplotlib-devel] John: Thoughts on a standard test system

2009-01-06 Thread Drain, Theodore R
Message- > From: John Hunter [mailto:jdh2...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 7:03 AM > To: Drain, Theodore R > Cc: matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [matplotlib-devel] John: Thoughts on a standard test > system > > On Mon, Dec 22, 200

Re: [matplotlib-devel] John: Thoughts on a standard test system

2009-01-06 Thread Darren Dale
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:02 AM, John Hunter wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Drain, Theodore R > wrote: > > John, > > Sometime in January, we are going to spend some time fixing a few minor > MPL bugs we've hit and a probably work on a few enhancements (I'll send you > a list in Jan b

Re: [matplotlib-devel] John: Thoughts on a standard test system

2009-01-06 Thread John Hunter
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Drain, Theodore R wrote: > John, > Sometime in January, we are going to spend some time fixing a few minor MPL > bugs we've hit and a probably work on a few enhancements (I'll send you a > list in Jan before we start anything - it's nothing major). We're also g