On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> On 04/11/2011 07:24 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>>> I couldn't find the old thread about Sourceforge bug tracker vs. the
>>> Github issue tracker, but maybe we should reevaluate based o
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>
> Brilliant, whatever they use allows uploading attachments.
I know this isn't ideal, but a workaround for screenshots/images in
mpl bug reports would be to upload them to something like imgur (free
- no registration required):
http://imgur.c
On 04/11/2011 11:19 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>> (Hmm... git doesn't use its own issue tracker for tracking its own
>> issues... what does that say?)
>
> Brilliant, whatever they use allows uploading attachments.
They are using this: http:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Michael Droettboom
> wrote:
> > (Hmm... git doesn't use its own issue tracker for tracking its own
> > issues... what does that say? )
>
> Brilliant, whatever they use allows uploading attachments.
>
>
Maybe i
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> (Hmm... git doesn't use its own issue tracker for tracking its own
> issues... what does that say? )
Brilliant, whatever they use allows uploading attachments.
---
On 04/11/2011 03:51 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> On 04/11/2011 07:24 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Michael Droettboom
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I couldn't find the old thread about Sourceforge bug tracker vs. the
>>> Github issue tracker, but maybe we should reevalua
On 04/11/2011 07:24 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>> I couldn't find the old thread about Sourceforge bug tracker vs. the
>> Github issue tracker, but maybe we should reevaluate based on the new
>> Github issue tracker announced on Saturday:
>
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Paul Ivanov wrote:
> Darren Dale, on 2011-04-11 13:24, wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>> > I couldn't find the old thread about Sourceforge bug tracker vs. the
>> > Github issue tracker, but maybe we should reevaluate based
Darren Dale, on 2011-04-11 13:24, wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> > I couldn't find the old thread about Sourceforge bug tracker vs. the
> > Github issue tracker, but maybe we should reevaluate based on the new
> > Github issue tracker announced on Saturday:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> I couldn't find the old thread about Sourceforge bug tracker vs. the
> Github issue tracker, but maybe we should reevaluate based on the new
> Github issue tracker announced on Saturday:
>
> https://github.com/blog/831-issues-2-0-the-ne
10 matches
Mail list logo