On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> Exactly. I *strongly* oppose any move in this direction. It would be
> enabling bad workflow strategy on the part of users, providing no
> benefit that cannot be achieved better with a good workflow strategy,
> and adding complexity. We have
Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
> Christopher Barker writes:
>
>> Joey Wilson wrote:
>>> I would like to be able to save the figures from
>>> matplotlib in an editable form, without flattening down to an image
>>> file.
>> I think to do this right, you'd need to completely re-design MPL to be
>> bas
Christopher Barker writes:
> Joey Wilson wrote:
>> I would like to be able to save the figures from
>> matplotlib in an editable form, without flattening down to an image
>> file.
>
> I think to do this right, you'd need to completely re-design MPL to be
> based on a more declarative structur
Joey Wilson wrote:
> I would like to be able to save the figures from
> matplotlib in an editable form, without flattening down to an image
> file.
> Now, I understand that resources are limited, so I would be willing to
> raise some money to get this feature added to Matplotlib.
I think to
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Joey Wilson wrote:
> Let me say why I think this feature is so essential. Anyone who is in
> research or academia knows that figures often need to be edited when a
> publication comes back from peer review. It's already happened to me many
> times, and I've learn
2009/12/16 Joey Wilson :
> Does anyone know the status of development for Matplotlib persistent figure
> saving? I would like to be able to save the figures from matplotlib in an
> editable form, without flattening down to an image file. The closest thing
> to this right now is the SVG output, but
