On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Pierre Haessig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 22/10/2013 19:14, Todd a écrit :
>
> Thanks for the feedback. I agree that your documentation does make clear
>> the distinction between "phase" and "angle" and that it has a consistency.
>> I just feel that this distinction doe
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Pierre Haessig wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Now that that PR #2522 is merged, I don't know how much futher commenting
> is useful, but I think there are two API details that I feel could be
> better :
>
> 1) API dissymetry
>
> The new pyplot/axes API is now:
>
> * 1 fun
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Pierre Haessig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 21/10/2013 15:58, Todd a écrit :
>
> 2) Should there be two separate functions for these two, or just one
>>
>> function, with a switch argument `unwrap` ? (I guess it would be True by
>> default)
>>
>
> I originally was going
Le 25/10/2013 14:57, Pierre Haessig a écrit :
> 2) default NFFT value being hidden from views
>
> used to be def specgram(x, NFFT=256, Fs=2, ...
> now is def specgram(x, NFFT=None, Fs=None
>
> I think that NFFT is an important parameter of the spectrum
> computation. It should not be /hidden f
Hi,
Le 21/10/2013 15:58, Todd a écrit :
>
> 2) Should there be two separate functions for these two, or just one
> function, with a switch argument `unwrap` ? (I guess it would be
> True by
> default)
>
>
> I originally was going to do that, but decided against it. The
> problem i
Hello,
Now that that PR #2522 is merged, I don't know how much futher
commenting is useful, but I think there are two API details that I feel
could be better :
1) API dissymetry
The new pyplot/axes API is now:
* 1 function *spectgram* now uses a mode argument to tune this behavior :
*mode*:
Hi,
Le 22/10/2013 19:14, Todd a écrit :
>
> Thanks for the feedback. I agree that your documentation does make
> clear the distinction between "phase" and "angle" and that it has
> a consistency. I just feel that this distinction does not exist
> "outside" ...
>
> But beyond th
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Pierre Haessig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 21/10/2013 15:58, Todd a écrit :
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Pierre Haessig > wrote:
>
>1) is the terminology "phase" vs. "angle" spectrum standardized ? I
>> must
>> say I've never heard of one meaning "wrapped" a
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Pierre Haessig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 22/10/2013 12:31, Todd a écrit :
> > Currently, both axes.psd and axes.csd return the same thing as
> > mlab.psd and mlab.csd, namely the spectrum and frequency points. They
> > do NOT return the line object that was plotted. Th
Hi,
Le 21/10/2013 15:58, Todd a écrit :
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Pierre Haessig
> mailto:pierre.haes...@crans.org>> wrote:
>
> 1) is the terminology "phase" vs. "angle" spectrum standardized ?
> I must
> say I've never heard of one meaning "wrapped" and the other
> "unwra
Hi,
Le 22/10/2013 12:31, Todd a écrit :
> Currently, both axes.psd and axes.csd return the same thing as
> mlab.psd and mlab.csd, namely the spectrum and frequency points. They
> do NOT return the line object that was plotted. This is different
> than specgram, which returns the AxesImage object
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Todd wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I submitted a pull request #2522 [1]. It includes support for more basic
> spectrum plots like magnitude and phase spectrums. These are extremely
> commonly used in signal processing, acoustics, and many other fields, but
> are also very
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Pierre Haessig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 20/10/2013 09:45, Todd a écrit :
> > I submitted a pull request #2522 [1]. It includes support for more
> > basic spectrum plots like magnitude and phase spectrums. These are
> > extremely commonly used in signal processing, aco
Hi,
Le 20/10/2013 09:45, Todd a écrit :
> I submitted a pull request #2522 [1]. It includes support for more
> basic spectrum plots like magnitude and phase spectrums. These are
> extremely commonly used in signal processing, acoustics, and many
> other fields, but are also very important for ed
14 matches
Mail list logo