On 15 March 2013 17:18, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On 15 Mar 2013 16:50, "Todd" wrote:
> > Within the axes constructor, the constructor would run through each of
> these modules and store them as attributes with the same name as the
> function and the function itself being the contents. At least
On 15 Mar 2013 16:50, "Todd" wrote:
> Within the axes constructor, the constructor would run through each of
these modules and store them as attributes with the same name as the
function and the function itself being the contents. At least if me
understanding is correct, this would make them beha