Michael Droettboom wrote:
John Hunter wrote:
log_demo.py 1.769 2.011 0.242113%
Here is another area where there is an important difference. Panning
and zooming interactively with log scaling is much slower on the
branch, presumably because you have to r
John Hunter wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2007 1:51 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Very odd. I've been running my own very similar benchmark as I've been
>> going, and the two code bases perform quite similarly. The branch
>> continues to cache the markers in more or less the same
On Nov 15, 2007 1:51 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very odd. I've been running my own very similar benchmark as I've been
> going, and the two code bases perform quite similarly. The branch
> continues to cache the markers in more or less the same way as on the
> trunk. He
John Hunter wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2007 12:53 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Thought some of you may be interested to know that the speed on the
>> branch is getting much better. Whereas earlier the branch was about 2x
>> slower than the trunk, now most things are close to eq
On Nov 15, 2007 12:53 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thought some of you may be interested to know that the speed on the
> branch is getting much better. Whereas earlier the branch was about 2x
> slower than the trunk, now most things are close to equal with the trunk
> speed
