Re: [matplotlib-devel] Website needs love

2011-05-23 Thread Benjamin Root
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Ben Gamari wrote: > On Mon, 23 May 2011 09:35:57 -0400, Michael Droettboom > wrote: > > Generating the thumbnails has no additional requirements (it uses > > matplotlib's image module to scale the images). However, it may be a > > problem with multiprocessing -

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Website needs love

2011-05-23 Thread Ben Gamari
On Mon, 23 May 2011 09:35:57 -0400, Michael Droettboom wrote: > Generating the thumbnails has no additional requirements (it uses > matplotlib's image module to scale the images). However, it may be a > problem with multiprocessing -- the thumbnails are generated in parallel > on multi-core ma

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Website needs love

2011-05-23 Thread Michael Droettboom
On 05/22/2011 05:33 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Eric Firing > wrote: On 05/22/2011 10:07 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > I went ahead with the merge conflict procedure, and everything appear to > be ok. I had also noticed a

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Website needs love

2011-05-22 Thread Eric Firing
On 05/22/2011 11:33 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Eric Firing > wrote: > > On 05/22/2011 10:07 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > I went ahead with the merge conflict procedure, and everything > appear to > > be ok. I had

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Website needs love

2011-05-22 Thread Benjamin Root
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 05/22/2011 10:07 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > I went ahead with the merge conflict procedure, and everything appear to > > be ok. I had also noticed a few additional mistakes in the INSTALL file > > currently in v1.0.x that I fixed as we

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Website needs love

2011-05-22 Thread Eric Firing
On 05/22/2011 10:07 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > I went ahead with the merge conflict procedure, and everything appear to > be ok. I had also noticed a few additional mistakes in the INSTALL file > currently in v1.0.x that I fixed as well. I will double-check the > commit/merge before pushing it u

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Website needs love

2011-05-22 Thread Benjamin Root
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > >> >> I have not yet tried to build from your branch, but based on >> descriptions and discussions, it should be a substantial improvement. Go >> ahead and push when you feel ready.

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Website needs love

2011-05-22 Thread Benjamin Root
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > > I have not yet tried to build from your branch, but based on > descriptions and discussions, it should be a substantial improvement. Go > ahead and push when you feel ready. Thank you for all the work. > > I have started to try and merge my

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Website needs love

2011-05-20 Thread Eric Firing
On 05/20/2011 11:48 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > Some other ideas I have had is to include a link to the glossary page in > the page header next to "docs", and maybe the FAQ, as well? I also want > to expand the glossary page, and comb through the docstrings to > incorporate more ":term:" usage. H

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Website needs love

2011-05-20 Thread Eric Firing
On 05/20/2011 11:48 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > I have made a few more small changes, and I have an additional change > that I have not committed yet. The table of contents for the examples > page has every single example titled as something like "animation > example code:". This is repeatiti

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Website needs love

2011-05-20 Thread Benjamin Root
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > >> On Monday, May 16, 2011, John Hunter wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Eric Firing >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > I had no idea this would open such a big can

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Website needs love

2011-05-19 Thread Benjamin Root
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > On Monday, May 16, 2011, John Hunter wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > > > > > > > > I had no idea this would open such a big can of worms! The strategy > > question here is, what do we want to inclu

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Website needs love

2011-05-16 Thread Benjamin Root
On Monday, May 16, 2011, John Hunter wrote: > > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > > > > I had no idea this would open such a big can of worms!  The strategy > question here is, what do we want to include in the html API docs? > > It looks like the process of setting up the s

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Website needs love

2011-05-16 Thread Benjamin Root
On Monday, May 16, 2011, Eric Firing wrote: > On 05/16/2011 09:32 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Benjamin Root > > wrote: >> >> >> >>     On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Eric Firing >     > wrote: >> >>        

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Website needs love

2011-05-16 Thread Eric Firing
On 05/16/2011 09:32 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Benjamin Root > wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Eric Firing > wrote: > > On 05/16/2011 06:56 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > >

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Website needs love

2011-05-16 Thread John Hunter
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > > I had no idea this would open such a big can of worms! The strategy > question here is, what do we want to include in the html API docs? > > It looks like the process of setting up the sphinx API docs was never > completed; the present set

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Website needs love

2011-05-16 Thread Eric Firing
On 05/16/2011 09:08 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Eric Firing > wrote: > > On 05/16/2011 06:56 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:53 PM, John Hunter > >

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Website needs love

2011-05-16 Thread Benjamin Root
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > >> On 05/16/2011 06:56 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:53 PM, John Hunter > > > wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Ma

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Website needs love

2011-05-16 Thread Benjamin Root
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 05/16/2011 06:56 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:53 PM, John Hunter > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Benjamin Root > > w

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Website needs love

2011-05-16 Thread Eric Firing
On 05/16/2011 06:56 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:53 PM, John Hunter > wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Benjamin Root > wrote: > > > > > The one thing I am confused about is what file to

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Website needs love

2011-05-16 Thread Benjamin Root
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:53 PM, John Hunter wrote: > > > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > >> >> >> >> The one thing I am confused about is what file to edit for the main page. >> I must be very dense because I just simply can not figure out where the main >> page is gen

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Website needs love

2011-05-10 Thread John Hunter
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > > The one thing I am confused about is what file to edit for the main page. > I must be very dense because I just simply can not figure out where the main > page is generated from. I have been meaning to fix some things on the front >

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Website needs love

2011-05-10 Thread Benjamin Root
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 5/10/11 9:43 AM, Ben Gamari wrote: > > The website is quite out of date. Not only does it claim that the latest > > release is 1.0.0, but the link to the github repository appears to be > > broken (has unneeded .git at the end of it). > > >

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Website needs love

2011-05-10 Thread Jason Grout
On 5/10/11 9:43 AM, Ben Gamari wrote: > The website is quite out of date. Not only does it claim that the latest > release is 1.0.0, but the link to the github repository appears to be > broken (has unneeded .git at the end of it). > Is the website itself in the git repository? If so, I suppose s