On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 01:24:37PM +0200, Stefan van der Walt wrote:
> I am interested in this problem, too. A binary comparison would
> probably be too sensitive. How about comparing coefficients of some
> transform? I.e. the residual on certain Fourier coefficients or parts
> of a wavelet tran
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 07:55:13PM -0700, Andrew Straw wrote:
> Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 08:46:24AM -0400, Paul Kienzle wrote:
> >> We could store a copy of the png output somewhere in the svn tree.
> >> Then,
> >> whenever we change something we can do a binary comparison
Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 08:46:24AM -0400, Paul Kienzle wrote:
>> We could store a copy of the png output somewhere in the svn tree.
>> Then,
>> whenever we change something we can do a binary comparison on all the
>> plots. It would avoid issues such as breakage of polar pl
Paul Kienzle wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 08:14:19AM -0400, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>> On a broader note, I've been using backend_driver.py as my ersatz
>> "acceptance test suite." Not all of these examples are included in it,
>> of course. Is there good reason for that, or should I go ah
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 08:46:24AM -0400, Paul Kienzle wrote:
> We could store a copy of the png output somewhere in the svn tree.
> Then,
> whenever we change something we can do a binary comparison on all the
> plots. It would avoid issues such as breakage of polar plots where the
> author of th
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 08:14:19AM -0400, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> On a broader note, I've been using backend_driver.py as my ersatz
> "acceptance test suite." Not all of these examples are included in it,
> of course. Is there good reason for that, or should I go ahead and add
> these to b
