> "Eric" == Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eric> But in the process of making that pass, I ran into a small
Eric> worm can: in the collections the kwargs and the setters
Eric> don't match, so kwdocd['PatchCollection'], for example, is
Eric> not quite right. The colle
John Hunter wrote:
>> "Eric" == Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Eric> I can continue making the necessary changes if that is OK
> Eric> with you, but I don't want our versions to get tangled up if
> Eric> you are still working on this aspect, or if you don't like
>
> "Eric" == Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eric> I can continue making the necessary changes if that is OK
Eric> with you, but I don't want our versions to get tangled up if
Eric> you are still working on this aspect, or if you don't like
Eric> the strategy modificatio
John Hunter wrote:
[...]
I am in the process of changing your shiny new kwdocd machinery
slightly. I added artist.kwdoc so that
> artist.kwdocd['Line2D'] =
> '\n'.join(artist.ArtistInspector(Line2D).pprint_setters(leadingspace=12))
>
becomes
artist.kwdocd['Line2D'] = artist.kwdoc(Line2D)
>
> "John" == John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> I think we could lose python2.2 support if there is a good
John> reason. Is anyone still using it? I'll also post to the
John> user's list. Perhaps in the next release we should issue
John> deprecation warnings for 2.2
> "Eric" == Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> * Are your changes python2.3 compatible? We are still trying
>> to support 2.3, so avoid 2.4 only features like decorators
>> until we remove 2.3 support
Eric> Good, I thought we were still restricted to 2.2!
I was wonde
> * Are your changes python2.3 compatible? We are still trying to
> support 2.3, so avoid 2.4 only features like decorators until we
> remove 2.3 support
Good, I thought we were still restricted to 2.2!
Does this mean boilerplate.py should be updated? (Or maybe it isn't
worth fiddli
