Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday

On Mar 26, 2012, at 7:37 PM, Derek Homeier wrote: > Hi Sandro, > >> yes, Debian has a separate package for documentation (since it >> requires to be build just on time, whilc mpl requires to be built on >> each architecture we support, so splitting the package results in a >> lot of saved s

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday

Hi Sandro, > yes, Debian has a separate package for documentation (since it > requires to be build just on time, whilc mpl requires to be built on > each architecture we support, so splitting the package results in a > lot of saved space). JFYR this is the layout of packages in Debian: > > python

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday

On 26.03.2012, at 7:43PM, John Hunter wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Russell Owen wrote: > On Mar 24, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 18:13, Derek Homeier > > wrote: > >> I used the 1.1.0 version to build with the fink Python installation on > >>

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Russell Owen wrote: > On Mar 24, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 18:13, Derek Homeier > > wrote: > >> I used the 1.1.0 version to build with the fink Python installation on > MaxOS X > >> and everything seems to work there, pa

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday

On Mar 24, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 18:13, Derek Homeier > wrote: >> I used the 1.1.0 version to build with the fink Python installation on MaxOS >> X >> and everything seems to work there, passing the tests at least (does >> pylab.test('full') >> execute

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday

: Rui DaCosta Cc: matplotlib development list Sent: Monday, 26 March 2012, 15:02 Subject: Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Rui DaCosta wrote: Attached is the testing output on both Win7x64 and WinXPx32. > > >FAILED

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Rui DaCosta wrote: > Attached is the testing output on both Win7x64 and WinXPx32. > > FAILED (KNOWNFAIL=268, errors=144) > > In case anybody else is having issues, the head version of nose is > required to run the tests due to multiprocessing issues in the stable

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday

On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 18:55, John Hunter wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> >> >> I'll start testing debian packaging right away; for our package we >> also need the sampledata tarball: can I reuse the one for 1.1.0 or is >> a new one needed? >> > > You can use the

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday

Hi Derek, On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:50, Derek Homeier wrote: > I was also curious if you had considered moving the docs to a separate > package. > I will propose one for fink; yes, Debian has a separate package for documentation (since it requires to be build just on time, whilc mpl requires t

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday

On 24.03.2012, at 8:16PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > to run tests I use: > > python -c "import matplotlib as m ; m.test(verbosity=1)" > Ah, thanks for the reminder; that looks much more comprehensive! Actually the fink testing command requires an exit value of 1 or higher to detect errors, so I am

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday

On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 18:13, Derek Homeier wrote: > I used the 1.1.0 version to build with the fink Python installation on MaxOS X > and everything seems to work there, passing the tests at least (does > pylab.test('full') > execute all tests? It seems a rather small number…). to run tests I u

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday

Hi Sandro, > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 03:18, John Hunter wrote: >> The tarballs for the v1.1.1 release candidate 1 (rc1) are uploaded to and >> are available for testing and building binaries >> >> >> https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.1/ >> >> After th

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday

Hi John, On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 03:18, John Hunter wrote: > The tarballs for the v1.1.1 release candidate 1 (rc1) are uploaded to and > are available for testing and building binaries > >  https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.1/ > > After the binaries are u

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday

On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Russell E. Owen wrote: > > I have uploaded the Mac builds (no Python 2.6 yet; do we really need > that?). They pass all unit tests and the 32-bit version seems to work > well with my software. > > Might be nice to upload some python2.6 builds for the actual relea

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday

On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Russell E. Owen wrote: > > The included pytz is outdated (and I did not bother to uprev it in the > binaries I uploaded); would somebody be willing to update that before we > cut the final releases, or is that considered too risky at this late > date? > > It feel

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday

On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > I'll start testing debian packaging right away; for our package we > also need the sampledata tarball: can I reuse the one for 1.1.0 or is > a new one needed? > > You can use the same one -- because this is a bugfix release, we have not int

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday

In article , John Hunter wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:58 PM, John Hunter > wrote: > > > I think we are pretty close to cleaning up issues and PRs related to > > v1.1.x, so I'd like to cut the release candidate this Thursday. Let's > > continue to hammer on closing open issues and pul

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Christoph Gohlke wrote: > > > Windows binaries, including the test files, are at < > http://www.lfd.uci.edu/~**gohlke/pythonlibs/#matplotlib > >**. > > All my attempts to upload the files to SF failed (no err

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday

On 3/22/2012 7:18 PM, John Hunter wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:58 PM, John Hunter > wrote: > > I think we are pretty close to cleaning up issues and PRs related to > v1.1.x, so I'd like to cut the release candidate this Thursday. > Let's continu

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:58 PM, John Hunter wrote: > I think we are pretty close to cleaning up issues and PRs related to > v1.1.x, so I'd like to cut the release candidate this Thursday. Let's > continue to hammer on closing open issues and pull requests, and flag > anything that needs to be

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday

In article , John Hunter wrote: > I think we are pretty close to cleaning up issues and PRs related to > v1.1.x, so I'd like to cut the release candidate this Thursday. Let's > continue to hammer on closing open issues and pull requests, and flag > anything that needs to be addressed before th

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday

I just put a pull request up that resolves these tests for me: #779. If it's working for others, we should go ahead and merge that into v1.1.x before the release. Mike On 03/20/2012 09:49 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: We seem to have a large number of failing tests due to the recent fixes to

Re: [matplotlib-devel] matplotlib v1.1.1 (bugfix) rc1 on Thursday

We seem to have a large number of failing tests due to the recent fixes to the snapping behavior. Mainly these just need to be triaged and have the baseline images replaced. I'm going to see how far I get on this today. Mike On 03/19/2012 01:58 PM, John Hunter wrote: I think we are pretty cl