On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> That is the end goal. I'm talking simply about the static webpage hosting
> here. If I recall correctly, I think the space limitations on github used
> to be a problem for us, which is why we haven't used it as the canonical web
> host
On 08/10/2012 03:45 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>> Supporting existing links to matplotlib.sourceforge.net is of course
>> very important, and I would put whatever redirects we need to keep those
>> working in any event.
> Actually, why no
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Supporting existing links to matplotlib.sourceforge.net is of course
> very important, and I would put whatever redirects we need to keep those
> working in any event.
Actually, why not move all the official domain machinery to
matplotl
> As far as I can see the github docs are as up-to-date as the
> souceforge ones.
Scrub that statement. My browser cache needed clearing.
On 10 August 2012 15:44, Phil Elson wrote:
> I wasn't involved at the time, but was it because
> matplotlib.github.com is slower?
>
> As far as I can see
I wasn't involved at the time, but was it because
matplotlib.github.com is slower?
As far as I can see the github docs are as up-to-date as the
souceforge ones. (although reading the commit log on the docs repo
doesn't seem to agree with that statement)
All in all, sounds promising.
On 10 August
