On Nov 14, 2008, at 12:36 PM, Paul Kienzle wrote:
>>
>> Any reason not to implement this simply as an additional kwarg to
>> Wedge, rather than a new class -- since Ring with a r2 == 0 is
>> equivalent to Wedge anyway? Just thinking of having less code to
>> maintain...but maybe that's more confu
Paul Kienzle wrote:
>
> On Nov 14, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>
>> Paul Kienzle wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We found we needed to draw a partial ring, but didn't see one in
>>> patches.py.
>>>
>>> Attached is a generalization of Wedge to accept an inner and an
>>> outer radius.
>>>
>>
On Nov 14, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Paul Kienzle wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We found we needed to draw a partial ring, but didn't see one in
>> patches.py.
>>
>> Attached is a generalization of Wedge to accept an inner and an
>> outer radius.
>>
>> Should I add this to patches?
Paul Kienzle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We found we needed to draw a partial ring, but didn't see one in
> patches.py.
>
> Attached is a generalization of Wedge to accept an inner and an outer
> radius.
>
> Should I add this to patches?
Looks like a useful feature to me. Could be used for doing these sort
