Hi,
What is the reason for having both barh and bar, when the latter
accepts the orientation='horizontal' argument? I am asking because of
sf bug #1669506, which is about hist(orientation='horizontal') not
working because it passes a log kwarg to barh.
--
Jouni K. Seppänen
http://www.iki.fi/jks
Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the reason for having both barh and bar, when the latter
> accepts the orientation='horizontal' argument? I am asking because of
> sf bug #1669506, which is about hist(orientation='horizontal') not
> working because it passes a log kwarg to barh.
>
I di
On 3/2/07, Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't do it--but it looks like the reason is that having barh as a
> separate method permits a more natural order of arguments without
> introducing more complexity in the argument handling.
barh was originally added for compatibility with m
Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looks like barh just needs to take a **kwargs (which could replace most
> of the present listed kwargs; or add a log kwarg to the list) and pass
> it along to bar. You are taking care of this?
I replaced most of the kwargs by a **kwargs dict in svn rev
