Re: [matplotlib-devel] QT backend bug - working patch this time

2007-09-23 Thread Eike Welk
Sorry, I've sent a corrupted patch. This one should work. Regards, Eike. Index: backend_qt.py === --- backend_qt.py (revision 3876) +++ backend_qt.py (working copy) @@ -46,11 +46,14 @@ qApp = qt.QApplication( [" "] )

[matplotlib-devel] Agg license for 2.5: OK now?

2007-09-23 Thread Eric Firing
John et al., "Agg 2.5 will ship with a libsigc++ license that will allow us to treat the code as MIT X11 unless the code is pulled out, allowing Antigrain to be used internally for Silverlight and allowing them to license Antigrain for other customers." I found the above quote on this page: ht

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Agg license for 2.5: OK now?

2007-09-23 Thread Bill Baxter
On 9/24/07, Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > John et al., > > "Agg 2.5 will ship with a libsigc++ license that will allow us to treat > the code as MIT X11 unless the code is pulled out, allowing Antigrain to > be used internally for Silverlight and allowing them to license > Antigrain fo

Re: [matplotlib-devel] Agg license for 2.5: OK now?

2007-09-23 Thread Eric Firing
Bill Baxter wrote: > > On 9/24/07, *Eric Firing* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > John et al., > > "Agg 2.5 will ship with a libsigc++ license that will allow us to treat > the code as MIT X11 unless the code is pulled out, allowing Antigrain to > be u