On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm stumped. It looks like the code (and even the inputs to
> draw_text_image) are virtually identical, modulo the differences between Agg
> 2.3 and 2.4. Maybe the change is in Agg, and 2.4 is theoretically more
> c
The attached script, run on svn mpl, illustrates a positioning problem:
note that the subplot titles are badly positioned in the 50 dpi version.
I believe that changing from 150 to 50 dpi should yield a perfect
scaling of everything in the plot, but it doesn't. There is a similar
problem with
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The attached script, run on svn mpl, illustrates a positioning problem: note
> that the subplot titles are badly positioned in the 50 dpi version. I
> believe that changing from 150 to 50 dpi should yield a perfect scaling
John,
Thank you very much--that's a big help. Some time today or tomorrow I
will try to track down any remaining quiver problems. I suspect similar
dpi-related problems may lurk elsewhere as well.
Those lazy values worked pretty well!
One of the things that puzzles me is the following method
