John Hunter wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 3:14 AM, Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> 1) The hline generated by frac is too long with dpi=50.
>>
>
> The problem with the hline appears to be that the width of the line in
> the frac has a component that depends on the thickness
John Hunter wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> I'm stumped. It looks like the code (and even the inputs to
>> draw_text_image) are virtually identical, modulo the differences between Agg
>> 2.3 and 2.4. Maybe the change is in Agg, and
Paul Kienzle wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 08:38:02AM -0400, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>
>> Paul Kienzle wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The superscripts in mpl don't seem to be placed at the correct height for
>>> small fonts. The y-tics on the attached plot shows this. The effect is
>>> si
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 09:51:54AM -0400, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Paul Kienzle wrote:
> >
> > Thanks. It looks much better in png, but pdf has the subscript raised much
> > higher,
> That was a DPI-related bug, that is hopefully now fixed in SVN.
> > and svg isn't rendering fonts at all (see
Hi all,
I just discovered that attempting to plot a complex array using imshow()
results in a not-very-helpful traceback (attached). Would it be worth
catching this on the actual call to imshow() and raising a more
transparent error? (The test script, slightly modified from Gaël
Varoquaux's pyrepo
Andrew Straw wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just discovered that attempting to plot a complex array using imshow()
> results in a not-very-helpful traceback (attached). Would it be worth
> catching this on the actual call to imshow() and raising a more
> transparent error? (The test script, slightly modif
