Hello *,
right now the NonUniformImage class in image.py uses numpy's asarray
method. All similar classes instead use numpy.ma.asarray, thus allowing
for masked images.
I think this should be changed as in the attached patch.
Otherwise thanks for matplotlib :)
Klaus
Index: matplotlib/lib/matplotl
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 08:05:52AM +0200, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 07:31:19AM +0200, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
> > - show starts a mainloop and is blocking even if there are not windows
> > open. This basically leads to a deadlock where the user cannot
> > interrupt the
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Klaus Zimmermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello *,
>
> right now the NonUniformImage class in image.py uses numpy's asarray
> method. All similar classes instead use numpy.ma.asarray, thus allowing
> for masked images.
> I think this should be changed as in the
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 4:07 AM, Gael Varoquaux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could somebody review this patch and possibly check it in? It is not
> perfect but is, IMHO, a good start that works on everything I have thrown
OK, looks good; I've committed it to svn r5798. I have commented out
the t
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 08:09 -1000, Eric Firing wrote:
> It sounds like there is time to do it before the release without messing
> up the release. Just make sure the backend_drivers.py test suite still
> runs OK. If you can add tests (i.e., examples run by backend_drivers)
> that exercise
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 7:51 AM, David Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2) Can someone explain to me why is_string_like in the cbook doesn't
> just do isinstance(obj,str)? Is there anything "string like" that won't
> be caught be this isinstance call?
In [65]: s = u'jdh'
In [66]: isinsta
Hi,
Similar level of question: What is the policy on using scipy in
matplotlib? I want to use linear interpolation, and
simple_linear_interpolation in the cbook doesn't do what I want. I
imagine that we are trying to avoid dependence on scipy.
Thanks,
David
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 08:42 -0500,
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:17 AM, David Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Similar level of question: What is the policy on using scipy in
> matplotlib? I want to use linear interpolation, and
> simple_linear_interpolation in the cbook doesn't do what I want. I
> imagine that we are trying to a
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 05:30:00AM -0500, John Hunter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 4:07 AM, Gael Varoquaux
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Could somebody review this patch and possibly check it in? It is not
> > perfect but is, IMHO, a good start that works on everything I have thrown
> OK,
I've been to trying add more flexible control over the axis lines,
ticks, tick labels, etc., but I think I'm in over my head on this
project. Again and again, I've settled on one approach only to
completely rewrite it the next time I look at the code. I'm looking
for some major design advic
Ryan May wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that offset_copy() went away in the transforms rewrite and was
> replaced with a trans + transfroms.Affine2D().translate(x,y). This
> works fine for x,y in pixels. However, offset_copy would also let you
> specify x,y in points. How can I get that to work
John Hunter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 7:51 AM, David Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> 2) Can someone explain to me why is_string_like in the cbook doesn't
>> just do isinstance(obj,str)? Is there anything "string like" that won't
>> be caught be this isinstance call?
>
> In [65]:
Ryan May wrote:
> John Hunter wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Ryan May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> The only issue I've seen is that scaling with PS is way too big. I've
>>> attached ps and pdf files from the same run to show the problem.
>> The only thing I can think of is since
Jeff Whitaker wrote:
>> Basically, Fortune's sweepline algorithm for Delaunay triangulation
>> simply needs to be replaced with an algorithm that can be formulated
>> using Jonathan Shewchuck's robust predicates:
>>
>> http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~quake/robust.html
great idea.
> I chec
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 7:51 AM, David Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> 2) Can someone explain to me why is_string_like in the cbook doesn't
>>> just do isinstance(obj,str)? Is there anything
arrg!
When am I going to learn not to click "send" until after I've read the
entire thread!
Jeff Whitaker wrote:
> John: I just contacted NCAR again, and it seems that they have
> relicensed the software under an OSI-based license similar to the
> University of Illinois/NCSA:
...
> What do yo
John Hunter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Klaus Zimmermann
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello *,
>>
>> right now the NonUniformImage class in image.py uses numpy's asarray
>> method. All similar classes instead use numpy.ma.asarray, thus allowing
>> for masked images.
>> I think this
Ryan May wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As promised, here's a short patch to add get_offsets() and set_offsets()
> to the Collections() base class. I tried to make it do the right thing
> with regard to _offsets vs. _uniform_offsets, depending on whether
> _uniform_offsets is None. I also had tried to make
Christopher Barker wrote:
> Jeff Whitaker wrote:
>> I checked
>> Shewchuk's web page and unfortunately his code comes with this license:
>
> ...
>
> How I wish people would just pick a known Open Source License -- it's
> not like there are a shortage of them! Might it be worth a note to
> She
Andrew Straw wrote:
>> may be the quickest and most general way to do it. I believe
>> ~np.isfinite is both more general and significantly faster than np.isnan.
>
> Clever, but it won't work as-is. np.isfinite('b') returns a
> NotImplementedType, and a default argument to scatter is c='b', which
John,
I am still struggling to understand exactly how units support works, and
what is needed to make it work everywhere that it should. I see that it
works in plot, for example; it is not even necessary to use plot_date.
It does not work in scatter, and at first I thought that was because of
Eric Firing wrote:
> Ryan May wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As promised, here's a short patch to add get_offsets() and set_offsets()
>> to the Collections() base class. I tried to make it do the right thing
>> with regard to _offsets vs. _uniform_offsets, depending on whether
>> _uniform_offsets is None.
Eric Firing schrieb:
John Hunter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Klaus Zimmermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello *,
right now the NonUniformImage class in image.py uses numpy's asarray
method. All similar classes instead use numpy.ma.asarray, thus allowing
for masked images.
[...]
M
I don't know if this simplifies things (you're much deeper in the middle
of doing what you need to do), but PolyCollection really is a path
collection these days. (The name is really for historical reasons).
And since paths can be compound, you could draw a hollow circle using an
inner and an
Ryan May wrote:
> 5) I added an empty circle marker for low wind speeds (vector
> magnitudes). Accomplishing having the unfilled circle while having
> the barbs filled involved a bit of a "elegant hack". Using the set of
> vertices that draws the CirclePolygon, I add an additional copy of
> t
I'll update the example. You may also find ScaledTranlation useful for
what you're doing. It will allow you to avoid hardcoding the dpi.
http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/doc/html/devel/transformations.html#matplotlib.transforms.ScaledTranslation
Cheers,
Mike
Andrew Straw wrote:
> Ryan May wr
I'll second being confused at times. In the transformation conversion,
it was something I didn't know too much about up front, so it's quite
possible that I broke some things in that regard. (I know of some
already, but those were fixed shortly after things were merged into the
trunk around 0
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll second being confused at times. In the transformation conversion, it
> was something I didn't know too much about up front, so it's quite possible
> that I broke some things in that regard. (I know of some alrea
The solution is sufficiently obscure, that I decided to just
re-introduce offset_copy (r5804). It appears to work as before, and the
example works without changes, though let me know if you run into any snags.
Cheers,
Mike
Michael Droettboom wrote:
> I'll update the example. You may also find
John,
It seems like a slightly different design and some refactoring of the code
would help with this (of course that's WAY easier to say than it is to do).
I'm thinking of something like this:
Public API layer:
Very thin (i.e. minimum amount of code). The goal of this layer might be to
transform
Eric Firing wrote:
> Eric Firing wrote:
>> Ryan May wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As promised, here's a short patch to add get_offsets() and
>>> set_offsets() to the Collections() base class. I tried to make it do
>>> the right thing with regard to _offsets vs. _uniform_offsets,
>>> depending on wheth
Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Ryan May wrote:
>> 5) I added an empty circle marker for low wind speeds (vector
>> magnitudes). Accomplishing having the unfilled circle while having
>> the barbs filled involved a bit of a "elegant hack". Using the set of
>> vertices that draws the CirclePolygon,
Hi,
Has anyone ever thought about creating a TextCollection class? The
purpose would be similar to the other collections, to group a bunch of
text objects with similar properties. This probably couldn't inherit
from Collection as of now though, since Collection assumes things like
edgecolor
Klaus Zimmermann wrote:
> Eric Firing schrieb:
>> John Hunter wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Klaus Zimmermann
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello *,
right now the NonUniformImage class in image.py uses numpy's asarray
method. All similar classes instead use numpy.m
34 matches
Mail list logo
