Hi,
I just tried ginput with the latest SVN (gtkagg backend) and it seemed
to work fine. I recently have had problems with numpy, scipy,
matplotlib and/or wx getting out of sync in terms of binary
compatibility. Perhaps a rebuild of one or more of those will fix
things for you?
Cheers,
David
O
Hi,
Yes, I have fixed the problem in my version of matplotlib, but I haven't
had the time to look over all of my changes and commit them to SVN.
Next week things should get better. If you are really in a hurry, you
can try applying the attached patch set to SVN, but better to wait and
let me make
Hello David -
Sorry for the late reply. I am back from vacation.
Any luck on solving the problem of the disappearing contour lines when
labelling? It works fine when you don't use the 'inline', but the picture is
of course not as nice, as the labels are not in-line anymore. Maybe that
gives a clu
> Hi,
>I think there is bug in get_xticklabels(). According to the doc it
> should return a list of Text instances, instead it returns a list of
> TextWithDash instances. This also makes the following impossible (which
> should work of course):
>
> xtl = ax.get_xticklabels()
> ax.set_xtickl
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Jae-Joon Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks John,
>
> I'm afraid that I'm not quite sure what you're suggesting, and will be
> grateful if you describe it more specifically.
Sorry Jae-Joon -- I was in a big hurry yesterday (in the financial
industry we're a bi
Thanks John,
I think I'd better use a sf patch initially so that you or others can
review and improve it. I'll definitely need some help with
documentation as my English can be horrible sometime. On the other
hand, it would be much easier for me to do some maintenance work if I
can commit the chan
Jae-Joon Lee wrote:
> I guess this fancy box thing can be used with other artist objects
> also, although the legend object is an only object I can think of now.
> And my personal inclination is put those support code into patches.py
> and have a patch class around it, i.e., a FancyBoxPatch class
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Jae-Joon Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks John,
>
> I think I'd better use a sf patch initially so that you or others can
> review and improve it. I'll definitely need some help with
> documentation as my English can be horrible sometime. On the other
> hand,