Hi,
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 11:58 -0500, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> What is the argument against? It seems like this would be
> straightforward (at least from the outside). But I'm probably
> missing
> something.
More work for diminishing interest Perhaps I am incorrect, but I
think this
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 13:28 -0500, Stan West wrote:
> Beyond the two options of the screen coordinates and the data
> coordinates as the references, I
> believe it would be useful to allow other coordinate systems. If I
> wanted to diagonally
> watermark an entire figure with, say, "DRAFT" or
David Kaplan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 11:58 -0500, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>
>> What is the argument against? It seems like this would be
>> straightforward (at least from the outside). But I'm probably
>> missing
>> something.
>>
>
> More work for diminishing interest..
Thanks Michael,
I've attached a new diff file which I believe also has all the
necessary changes to the collections and images. I've also attached
two simple scripts which test the collections and image functionality.
I've had to make some modification to extension code in this patch
which is de
