Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hello guys!
> A Debian Developers just reported a bug[1] on debian matplotlib during
> his preparation to introduce GCC 4.4: matplotlib will fail to build
> with GCC 4.4 due to a missing include.
>
> Attached is a patch to fix this problem, forged from an updated trunk;
> hope
> You may want to have a look at the mplsizer MPL toolkit I
> wrote a long time ago and have failed to properly advertise
> or maintain.
Thanks; I'll take a look at it.
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your
Eric Firing wrote:
> Jozef Vesely wrote:
>
>> Hello matplotlib developers,
>>
>> I have implemented "svg.image_noscale" feature for ps and pdf backends. I
>> think
>> that resampling/scaling should be avoided, when vector format can scale image
>> itself.
>>
Unfortunately, the quality of i
Paul Kienzle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We found we needed to draw a partial ring, but didn't see one in
> patches.py.
>
> Attached is a generalization of Wedge to accept an inner and an outer
> radius.
>
> Should I add this to patches?
Looks like a useful feature to me. Could be used for doing these sort
On Nov 14, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Paul Kienzle wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We found we needed to draw a partial ring, but didn't see one in
>> patches.py.
>>
>> Attached is a generalization of Wedge to accept an inner and an
>> outer radius.
>>
>> Should I add this to patches?
Paul Kienzle wrote:
>
> On Nov 14, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>
>> Paul Kienzle wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We found we needed to draw a partial ring, but didn't see one in
>>> patches.py.
>>>
>>> Attached is a generalization of Wedge to accept an inner and an
>>> outer radius.
>>>
>>
On Nov 14, 2008, at 12:36 PM, Paul Kienzle wrote:
>>
>> Any reason not to implement this simply as an additional kwarg to
>> Wedge, rather than a new class -- since Ring with a r2 == 0 is
>> equivalent to Wedge anyway? Just thinking of having less code to
>> maintain...but maybe that's more confu
