Re: [matplotlib-devel] Including mathtex in matplotlib

2009-07-30 Thread Freddie Witherden
Him On 30 Jul 2009, at 02:27, John Hunter wrote: > Isn't this a bit backwards? The point of the GSOC project is to make > the mathtext project available as a smaller, lighter, more widely > accessible project. If it depends on mpl, what have we achieved > except complexity? Don't we want the f

[matplotlib-devel] 0.99 release candidate this weekend

2009-07-30 Thread John Hunter
Sorry I fell behind and did not get a release out earlier as I intended. I am going to take another stab this weekend so we can have something by scipy. Please commit anything you need to before the release, and I will ask Michael to create the release branch tomorrow. There will still be ample

[matplotlib-devel] pyplot.rgrids returns wrong values?

2009-07-30 Thread Tony Yu
Sorry for reposting, but the original may have been overlooked since it was buried deep in a matplotlib-users thread. Currently, `pyplot.rgrids` is returning tick lines instead of grid lines. My guess is that this is a typo, but there may be a compelling reason to return the tick lines. If i

[matplotlib-devel] curvelinear coordinate support in axes_grid and a possible refactoring of mpl.

2009-07-30 Thread Jae-Joon Lee
Hello, I recently committed a support for a curvelinear grid in the axes_grid toolkit. What it does for you is to draw a ticks and grid appropriate for a curvelinear coordinate system, as in the example below. http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/_images/demo_floating_axis1.png The main motivation

Re: [matplotlib-devel] curvelinear coordinate support in axes_grid and a possible refactoring of mpl.

2009-07-30 Thread John Hunter
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Jae-Joon Lee wrote: > >  ps. Are we having a sprint during the scipy conference by the way? I > may join remotely. I'll definitely be there Sat and Sun, so having you join in remotely would be great. I haven't organized any official topics yet, but we have plenty