Hi Hubert,
I just uploaded a fix for this bug to the matplotlib trunk svn repository (see
revision 8936). If you reinstall matplotlib from trunk, the bug should
disappear.
Best,
--Michiel.
--- On Thu, 1/27/11, Hubert Holin wrote:
> From: Hubert Holin
> Subject: [matplotlib-devel] MacOS X ba
I was trying to spot check the git repo by checking out the first
commit that we have a history for in the log
> git checkout 48111d043ec52f9afb511ac447438877b236e7f3
and notice that the main code directory 'matplotlib' was missing. I
then tried to compare with a svn checkout of the same revisio
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:00 PM, John Hunter wrote:
> I was trying to spot check the git repo by checking out the first
> commit that we have a history for in the log
>
>> git checkout 48111d043ec52f9afb511ac447438877b236e7f3
>
> and notice that the main code directory 'matplotlib' was missing. I
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:00:40 -0600, John Hunter wrote:
[clip]
> The first good svn version is apparently 541; the prior commit 540 had
> the log message "reorganizes py code". This was when we moved
> "matplotlib" to "lib/matplotlib" which I thought svn would handle
> gracefully. Any gurus have an
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> There seems to be some code under "branches/jdhunter/matplotlib/".
> Is it the correct stuff?
It's hard for me to know exactly if it the correct code (ie what was
in the HEAD of the trunk at revision 7) but it is at least the right
files i
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>> The first good svn version is apparently 541; the prior commit 540 had
>> the log message "reorganizes py code".
>> This was when we moved "matplotlib" to "lib/matplotlib" which I
>> thought svn would handle gracefully. Any gurus have any id
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:14 PM, John Hunter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>
>>> The first good svn version is apparently 541; the prior commit 540 had
>>> the log message "reorganizes py code".
>>> This was when we moved "matplotlib" to "lib/matplotlib" which I
>>>
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
> Stitched in from where? The jdhunter branch appears to only contain
> one commit, so it only contains the contents of matplotlib/ for rev4.
It's not a completely fleshed out thought, but if we got the cvs repo
before the directory move, did c
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 6:56 PM, John Hunter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>
>> Stitched in from where? The jdhunter branch appears to only contain
>> one commit, so it only contains the contents of matplotlib/ for rev4.
>
> It's not a completely fleshed out thought
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>> It's not a completely fleshed out thought, but if we got the cvs repo
>> before the directory move, did cvs to svn on that repo, and then
>> converted that to git, we might be able to stitch the two git
>> histories together, one from before
On 1/25/11 1:06 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
>> Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:19:37 -0500, Darren Dale wrote:
>>> There is a potential problem converting the entire basemap history to
>>> git. In svn commit 4418, trunk/toolkits had basemap and basemap-testi
11 matches
Mail list logo
