[matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

2011-09-23 Thread John Hunter
Today is the "go-live" date for the mpl release candidate. There are no more open issues tagged release_critical, so I suggest we branch this afternoon. This will give people a last chance to merge in remaining pull requests. If you know you are planning to handle a given pull request before the

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

2011-09-23 Thread Jouni K . Seppänen
John Hunter writes: > Today is the "go-live" date for the mpl release candidate. There are > no more open issues tagged release_critical, so I suggest we branch > this afternoon. This will give people a last chance to merge in > remaining pull requests. This pull request fixes a test failure:

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

2011-09-23 Thread John Hunter
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Jouni K. Seppänen wrote: > This pull request fixes a test failure: > > https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/476 > > Should I just merge it myself, or does someone still want to review it? Since you and Mike have both looked at it, it is probably good to g

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

2011-09-23 Thread Benjamin Root
On Friday, September 23, 2011, John Hunter wrote: > Today is the "go-live" date for the mpl release candidate. There are > no more open issues tagged release_critical, so I suggest we branch > this afternoon. This will give people a last chance to merge in > remaining pull requests. If you know

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

2011-09-23 Thread John Hunter
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 8:02 AM, John Hunter wrote: > Today is the "go-live" date for the mpl release candidate. There are > no more open issues tagged release_critical, so I suggest we branch > this afternoon.  This will give people a last chance to merge in > remaining pull requests.  If you kno

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

2011-09-23 Thread Michael Droettboom
I'm not able to reproduce this here (git/master on Ubuntu 10.4, Python 2.7). Can you send and/or link to an example broken image? The way in which it is failing may illustrate the cause of the problem. It could also be that the difference in the freetype library/settings is causing enough di

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

2011-09-23 Thread John Hunter
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > I'm not able to reproduce this here (git/master on Ubuntu 10.4, Python > 2.7).  Can you send and/or link to an example broken image?  The way in > which it is failing may illustrate the cause of the problem.  It could > also be that the

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

2011-09-23 Thread Michael Droettboom
I agree with your assessment -- it seems like a low-level difference in the freetype renderer. I guess we should increase the tolerance on these tests (by passing a tol keyword to the image_comparison decorator in test_mathtext.py). The default is 1e-3 -- we just need to find the minimum valu

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

2011-09-23 Thread John Hunter
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > I agree with your assessment -- it seems like a low-level difference in the > freetype renderer.  I guess we should increase the tolerance on these tests > (by passing a tol keyword to the image_comparison decorator in > test_mathtext.p

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

2011-09-23 Thread Benjamin Root
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > On Friday, September 23, 2011, John Hunter wrote: > > Today is the "go-live" date for the mpl release candidate. There are > > no more open issues tagged release_critical, so I suggest we branch > > this afternoon. This will give peopl

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

2011-09-23 Thread Christoph Gohlke
On 9/23/2011 6:02 AM, John Hunter wrote: > Today is the "go-live" date for the mpl release candidate. There are > no more open issues tagged release_critical, so I suggest we branch > this afternoon. This will give people a last chance to merge in > remaining pull requests. If you know you are

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

2011-09-23 Thread John Hunter
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 8:02 AM, John Hunter wrote: > Today is the "go-live" date for the mpl release candidate. There are > no more open issues tagged release_critical, so I suggest we branch > this afternoon.  This will give people a last chance to merge in > remaining pull requests.  If you kno

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

2011-09-23 Thread John Hunter
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:42 PM, John Hunter wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 8:02 AM, John Hunter wrote: >> Today is the "go-live" date for the mpl release candidate. There are >> no more open issues tagged release_critical, so I suggest we branch >> this afternoon.  This will give people a last

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

2011-09-23 Thread Benjamin Root
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 8:02 AM, John Hunter wrote: > Today is the "go-live" date for the mpl release candidate. There are > no more open issues tagged release_critical, so I suggest we branch > this afternoon. This will give people a last chance to merge in > remaining pull requests. If you kn

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

2011-09-23 Thread John Hunter
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > I wanted to do some changes to doc/users/installing.rst, but it is ignored > by the .gitignore file.  Is this information autogenerated somewhere else? This looks like an error in .gitignore. i wrote that file, and can assure you it was no

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

2011-09-23 Thread Benjamin Root
On Friday, September 23, 2011, John Hunter wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > >> I wanted to do some changes to doc/users/installing.rst, but it is ignored >> by the .gitignore file. Is this information autogenerated somewhere else? > > This looks like an error in .

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

2011-09-23 Thread Michael Droettboom
I haven't seen any of these warnings: DeprecationWarnings and PendingDeprecationWarnings are supposed to be turned of by default in a vanilla Python build. However, I'm familiar with the PyCObject/PyCapsule issue from working on the matplotlib-py3 branch. The py3 branch has changes to the loc

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

2011-09-23 Thread Benjamin Root
On Friday, September 23, 2011, Michael Droettboom wrote: > I haven't seen any of these warnings: DeprecationWarnings and PendingDeprecationWarnings are supposed to be turned of by default in a vanilla Python build. However, I'm familiar with the PyCObject/PyCapsule issue from working on the matpl

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

2011-09-23 Thread John Hunter
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > I haven't seen any of these warnings: DeprecationWarnings and > PendingDeprecationWarnings are supposed to be turned of by default in a > vanilla Python build.  However, I'm familiar with the PyCObject/PyCapsule > issue from working on t

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

2011-09-23 Thread Benjamin Root
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > On Friday, September 23, 2011, John Hunter wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > > >> I wanted to do some changes to doc/users/installing.rst, but it is > ignored > >> by the .gitignore file. Is this inf

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

2011-09-23 Thread Benjamin Root
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > >> >> >> On Friday, September 23, 2011, John Hunter wrote: >> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: >> > >> >> I wanted to do some changes to doc/users/installing

Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl release candidate branch

2011-09-23 Thread Benjamin Root
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: > >> >> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Benjamin Root wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Friday, September 23, 2011, John Hunter wrote: >>> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Benjamin Root >>