Hey Nic,
Thanks for bringing this up. I was the author for #819, so I'd like to
get some dicussion going on this, too. Sorry for the delay, I was in the
midst of writing a thesis, which I am now free of.
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:51:24PM -0500, Nic Eggert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to bring
On 2012/08/23 11:55 AM, Damon McDougall wrote:
> Hey Nic,
>
> Thanks for bringing this up. I was the author for #819, so I'd like to
> get some dicussion going on this, too. Sorry for the delay, I was in the
> midst of writing a thesis, which I am now free of.
>
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:51:24PM
Eric, you make a good point. I'm okay with that approach as well. It
also has the benefit of being the least work.
Nic
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> On 2012/08/23 11:55 AM, Damon McDougall wrote:
>> Hey Nic,
>>
>> Thanks for bringing this up. I was the author for #819, so
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> OK, here are mine: I oppose overloading plot with a "stacked" kwarg and
> functionality. It is complicated enough as it is. I don't see any
> problem with having "stackplot" and hist(..., stacked=True). They are
> just not all that similar.
On 2012/08/23 2:54 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>> OK, here are mine: I oppose overloading plot with a "stacked" kwarg and
>> functionality. It is complicated enough as it is. I don't see any
>> problem with having "stackplot" and hist(..., stac
I think this gives more reason to not add a stacked kwarg to plot. You
would need to add it to the log variants as well.
Nic
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> On 2012/08/23 2:54 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>>> OK, here ar
Hi Eric,
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand what you are getting at, but I don't think there
> should be any interface changes for plot or for their log variants.
I probably phrased my question poorly. I'm just wondering, how would
one use the propos
On 2012/08/23 6:41 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>> I'm not sure I understand what you are getting at, but I don't think there
>> should be any interface changes for plot or for their log variants.
>
> I probably phrased my question po
