On 11/11/2012 11:51 PM, Todd wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Todd wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Todd wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Damon McDougall
>>> wrote:
Hi Todd,
Firstly, thanks for taking the time to crystallise your thoughts in
word
Hi folks,
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Damon McDougall
wrote:
> Yeah that's a great idea. Get the word out.
I did:
https://speakerdeck.com/fperez/science-and-python-a-interactively-biased-retrospective-of-a-mostly-successful-decade?slide=17
and the crowd actually erupted into spontaneous a
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> On 11/11/2012 11:51 PM, Todd wrote:
>> Now that 1.2 is out, can we revisit this? I would like to get it
>> implemented for the next feature release.
>>
>
> Absolutely. I think the next step, once you have an implementation,
> would be
Hey everyone,
So I don't have a clear picture in my head of our development cycle, and I
don't think it's well documented. I didn't want thread jack, but in another
thread Mike wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> (BTW -- feel free to submit pull requests at any po
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Paul Ivanov wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> So I don't have a clear picture in my head of our development cycle, and I
> don't think it's well documented. I didn't want thread jack, but in another
> thread Mike wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Michael Droett
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Damon McDougall
> wrote:
>> Yeah that's a great idea. Get the word out.
>
> I did:
>
> https://speakerdeck.com/fperez/science-and-python-a-interactively-biased-retrospective-of-a-mostly-succes
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Paul Ivanov wrote:
>>
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> So I don't have a clear picture in my head of our development cycle, and I
>> don't think it's well documented. I didn't want thread jack, but in another
>> th
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Paul Ivanov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
>> On 11/11/2012 11:51 PM, Todd wrote:
>>> Now that 1.2 is out, can we revisit this? I would like to get it
>>> implemented for the next feature release.
>>>
>>
>> Absolutely. I thin
On 12 November 2012 20:52, Benjamin Root wrote:
> There are other git workflows, which are all perfectly valid. If you can
> convince us to use another, feel free to propose one. However, we have
> done a couple of releases with gitwash, and it has worked quite well for us
> given how small our
