Sorry to take so long to get to this. This is a nice piece of work.
The most obvious thing is that this is a copy-and-paste of the existing
WebAgg backend -- and maintaining the two is going to be much harder
than building both out of the same pieces. As of 6389d14f, the WebAgg
backend was ref
On 10/16/13 1:58 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Sorry to take so long to get to this. This is a nice piece of work.
>
> The most obvious thing is that this is a copy-and-paste of the existing
> WebAgg backend -- and maintaining the two is going to be much harder
> than building both out of the sam
