Hello everybody
Its been a couple of weeks an I was wondering if anybody has feedback for me.
https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/2465
I changed the description on the PR to be more precise.
At the begining I called it tabbed gtk3 figuremanager but it is more a
multi-figure-manager with
pip install of mpl 1.3.1 has issues.
It wants to install nose, but seems to be incompatible with py3.3:
Running setup.py install for nose
File "/home/nbecker/.local/lib/python3.3/site-
packages/nose/plugins/base.py", line 70
except OptionConflictError, e:
This was using pdfpages (if that matters)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./plot_stuff2.py", line 326, in
the_plot.finish (args, opt, time, res)
File "./plot_stuff2.py", line 145, in finish
self.pdf.savefig (self.fig)
File "/home/nbecker/.local/lib/python2.7/site-
packages/
This isn't a matplotlib bug. Somehow, a py2.x version of nose got into your
python3.3 site-packages. Try clearing that out first. Of course, it might
still be possible that we are somehow forcing the wrong nose to be
installed...
-
Can you provide a code example to reproduce this. I suspect that recent
work on path effects might be to blame here. Also, exactly which version of
matplotlib and numpy were you using? The assert was placed there about a
year ago IIRC to deal with a short-lived numpy bug.
--
Can you provide a standalone example to reproduce? The multipage_pdf.py
example works fine with xkcd switched on.
Mike
On 10/23/2013 08:01 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> This was using pdfpages (if that matters)
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>File "./plot_stuff2.py", line 326, in
>
This is really strange. It d/l 1.3.1, but then builds installs 1.3.0???
python3-pip install --user --up --no-deps matplotlib
Downloading/unpacking matplotlib from
https://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/matplotlib/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.3.1/matplotlib-1.3.1.tar.gz
Running setup.py egg_info
OK, this seems to be a pip caching bug. After rm -rf /tmp/pip*, it installed
correctly
Neal Becker wrote:
> This is really strange. It d/l 1.3.1, but then builds installs 1.3.0???
>
> python3-pip install --user --up --no-deps matplotlib
> Downloading/unpacking matplotlib from
>
https://downl
Benjamin Root wrote:
> Can you provide a code example to reproduce this. I suspect that recent
> work on path effects might be to blame here. Also, exactly which version of
> matplotlib and numpy were you using? The assert was placed there about a
> year ago IIRC to deal with a short-lived numpy b
On 10/23/2013 09:51 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Benjamin Root wrote:
>
>> Can you provide a code example to reproduce this. I suspect that recent
>> work on path effects might be to blame here. Also, exactly which version of
>> matplotlib and numpy were you using? The assert was placed there about a
>
In article
,
Matthew Brett
wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
> wrote:
> > Are there recent binaries for OS-X anywhere? There don't seem to be
> > any for recent releases on the MPL download page.
> >
> > I know we had a discussion about this
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Russell E. Owen wrote:
> In article
> ,
> Matthew Brett
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
>> wrote:
>> > Are there recent binaries for OS-X anywhere? There don't seem to be
>> > any for recent relea
On 10/23/2013 02:41 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Russell E. Owen wrote:
>> In article
>> ,
>> Matthew Brett
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Chris,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
>>> wrote:
Are there recent binaries for OS
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Russell E. Owen wrote:
> The last ones I got from you worked very well: just a few test failures
> and the current one seems to be doing about the same.
worked well for me too (something odd with wx back end re-rendering,
but I doubt that's a Mac build issue...)
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Russell E. Owen wrote:
>> The last ones I got from you worked very well: just a few test failures
>> and the current one seems to be doing about the same.
>
> worked well for me too (something odd with
15 matches
Mail list logo