Hi,
Le 22/10/2013 19:14, Todd a écrit :
>
> Thanks for the feedback. I agree that your documentation does make
> clear the distinction between "phase" and "angle" and that it has
> a consistency. I just feel that this distinction does not exist
> "outside" ...
>
> But beyond th
On 24/10/2013 21:26, Paul Ivanov wrote:
> One quick reply:
>
> Daniele Nicolodi, on 2013-10-24 21:03, wrote:
>> One thing I dislike is, for example, the add_subplot() method:
>>
>> f = plt.figure()
>> a = f.add_subplot(111)
>> a.plot(x, y)
>>
>> it feels completely out of place (why I need to add
Hello,
Now that that PR #2522 is merged, I don't know how much futher
commenting is useful, but I think there are two API details that I feel
could be better :
1) API dissymetry
The new pyplot/axes API is now:
* 1 function *spectgram* now uses a mode argument to tune this behavior :
*mode*:
Hi,
Le 21/10/2013 15:58, Todd a écrit :
>
> 2) Should there be two separate functions for these two, or just one
> function, with a switch argument `unwrap` ? (I guess it would be
> True by
> default)
>
>
> I originally was going to do that, but decided against it. The
> problem i
Le 25/10/2013 14:57, Pierre Haessig a écrit :
> 2) default NFFT value being hidden from views
>
> used to be def specgram(x, NFFT=256, Fs=2, ...
> now is def specgram(x, NFFT=None, Fs=None
>
> I think that NFFT is an important parameter of the spectrum
> computation. It should not be /hidden f
Daniele,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 24/10/2013 21:26, Paul Ivanov wrote:
> > One quick reply:
> >
> > Daniele Nicolodi, on 2013-10-24 21:03, wrote:
> >> One thing I dislike is, for example, the add_subplot() method:
> >>
> >> f = plt.figure()
> >> a = f.add_sub
On 25/10/2013 15:34, Benjamin Root wrote:
> This has already been done. We have the GridSpec API that everything
> else maps to, for compatibility. But most people still like
> add_subplot() and subplots() for some odd reason... I think the primary
> issue is one of documentation, and we are curre
There needs to be layers to the interface. At the bottom there is super
general stuff that will cover (we hope) 100% of use cases. However, the
cost is a very verbose interface with lots of knobs. To cope with this
there are higher level function which can deal with 90% of the use cases
and do s
On Oct 24, 2013 8:40 PM, "Chris Barker" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Michael Droettboom
wrote:
> > Here are the notes with action items from the meeting:
>
> thanks for posting that. I see:
>
> pylab - should it stay or should it go?
>
> Comment from the peanut gallery:
>
> Go.
I
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> It doesn't feel weird. It feels generalized.
>
or both ;-)
It is the same way to add any number of plots, regardless if it is just
> one, or twenty. If you don't want to do it that way, you can just simply do:
>
> fig = plt.figure()
> ax =
I think one thing that contributes a lot to the API issues is the
inconsistency between pyplot API and the OO API. There isn't any reason
the APIs need to be so different.
To continue with this example, pyplot.subplot and Figure.add_subplot do
basically the same thing, but they have different nam
I think another problem is having pyplot and axes as dumping grounds for
all plot types. This probably made sense back when there were only a few
types of plots, but now there is a massive number of them. They all end up
in one large class with one large documentation page, making it very hard
to
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Pierre Haessig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 21/10/2013 15:58, Todd a écrit :
>
> 2) Should there be two separate functions for these two, or just one
>>
>> function, with a switch argument `unwrap` ? (I guess it would be True by
>> default)
>>
>
> I originally was going
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Pierre Haessig wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Now that that PR #2522 is merged, I don't know how much futher commenting
> is useful, but I think there are two API details that I feel could be
> better :
>
> 1) API dissymetry
>
> The new pyplot/axes API is now:
>
> * 1 fun
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Pierre Haessig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 22/10/2013 19:14, Todd a écrit :
>
> Thanks for the feedback. I agree that your documentation does make clear
>> the distinction between "phase" and "angle" and that it has a consistency.
>> I just feel that this distinction doe
15 matches
Mail list logo
