This looks quite good to me.
I'd like some feedback from Thomas Caswell, who's looked at this part of
the code much more than I have lately, but assuming he's ok, you have my
go ahead to start the implementation.
Cheers,
Mike
On 01/08/2014 10:55 AM, Federico Ariza wrote:
> Hello everybody.
>
>
It's probably a good time to schedule another matplotlib Google Hangout.
Is this Thursday at 1500 UTC (10 am ET) too short notice for the usual
candidates?
I know there was discussion of getting Michiel de Hoon on today (which I
just saw, unfortunately). Is there another time in the future tha
I can do Thursday.
Tom
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> It's probably a good time to schedule another matplotlib Google Hangout.
>
> Is this Thursday at 1500 UTC (10 am ET) too short notice for the usual
> candidates?
>
> I know there was discussion of getting Michie
On 2014/01/13 5:11 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> This looks quite good to me.
>
And to me. If the implementation works out well, this will be a very
nice and much needed refactoring.
Eric
> I'd like some feedback from Thomas Caswell, who's looked at this part of
> the code much more than I h
Hi Everyone,
I found some time to look at the votes from the "Plot or Not?" experiment
Adrian Price-Whelan and I ran during SciPy last summer. You can take a look
at my summary at
http://datarazzi.wordpress.com/2014/01/13/plot-or-not-voting-results/, or
explore for yourself at http://plotornot.chr
On 2014/01/13 9:58 AM, Chris Beaumont wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I found some time to look at the votes from the "Plot or Not?"
> experiment Adrian Price-Whelan and I ran during SciPy last summer. You
> can take a look at my summary at
> http://datarazzi.wordpress.com/2014/01/13/plot-or-not-voting-r
