On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 08:52:27AM -0400, Michael Droettboom wrote:
Using this mathtext=True option (as opposed to using a delimiter that
TeX doesn't understand) or something else entirely, would certainly make
it easier to make usetex vs. not usetex more consistent.
I think so to.
More
Gael Varoquaux wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 08:38:49AM -0400, Michael Droettboom wrote:
text(x, y, 'what is the $\sin(x)$', mathtext=True)
Except for the backward incompatibility, I like this because it is explicit.
Juust a data point for the discussion. I think it
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 08:38:49AM -0400, Michael Droettboom wrote:
text(x, y, 'what is the $\sin(x)$', mathtext=True)
Except for the backward incompatibility, I like this because it is explicit.
Juust a data point for the discussion. I think it would be very nice if a
script gave the same
John Hunter wrote:
Option 1 is to educate them, and require them to \$
quote that symbol. Option 2 is to enable a text property eg mathtext,
and do
text(x, y, 'what is the $\sin(x)$', mathtext=True)
Except for the backward incompatibility, I like this because it is explicit.
Option 3 is
On Friday 27 July 2007 08:38:49 am Michael Droettboom wrote:
If we go with another delimiter, there are others in TeX to choose
from. Plain TeX uses $$ for display math, and LaTeX uses \[, \]. Both
of these are less likely to be legitimate literals. While display math
normally implies that
On Thursday 26 July 2007 11:40:23 am Fernando Perez wrote:
On 7/26/07, Darren Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 26 July 2007 10:30:34 am Ted Drain wrote:
Why do you need an api file at all? Why not have config be a python
package and let config/__init__.py take care of importing
A problem was reported on the users list that saving to a file named
'blah.pdf' using the wxagg backend actually saves a jpeg file named
'blah.pdf.jpg'. I think I can see how to fix this (by adding a block to
FigureCanvasWx.print_figure() similar to the existing blocks for ps and
svg), but would
On Jul 25, 2007, at 12:09 PM, John Hunter wrote:
Hi Ken -- sorry for the radio silence, I'm not intentionally ignoring
you. Real life has made some demands on my time of late, and probably
will until next week, but I was able to download, read through and
test your code.
I appreciate you
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Ken McIvor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:35:05
To:John Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:matplotlib development list matplotlib-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [matplotlib-devel] mpl1 draft
On Jul 25, 2007,
