I think you're right about this.
Mike
On 08/21/2010 03:08 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
Mike, John, or anyone else who works directly with Ticks:
I think you are the only ones who have worked with the code I suggest
changing as in the attached diff. It looks to me like the three *Tick
methods,
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
Mike, John, or anyone else who works directly with Ticks:
I think you are the only ones who have worked with the code I suggest
changing as in the attached diff. It looks to me like the three *Tick
methods,
On 08/23/2010 05:17 AM, John Hunter wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Eric Firingefir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
Mike, John, or anyone else who works directly with Ticks:
I think you are the only ones who have worked with the code I suggest
changing as in the attached diff. It looks to me
This is definitely a bug, but I thought I'd clarify and add in a little more...
The distinction between 'step' and 'stepfilled' is that 'step' is
supposed to show only the outline of the histogram with no lines in
between bins (standard practice in some fields), while 'stepfilled' is
supposed to
