Andrew Straw straw...@astraw.com writes:
Sorry for not noticing this earlier, but I'm looking in the baseline
image directory, and I see a bunch of *_pdf.png files. I guess these
have been convered to png from pdf on the tester's machine. Do you think
it makes more sense to have the .pdf
Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
Andrew Straw straw...@astraw.com writes:
Sorry for not noticing this earlier, but I'm looking in the baseline
image directory, and I see a bunch of *_pdf.png files. I guess these
have been convered to png from pdf on the tester's machine. Do you think
it makes
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Andrew Straw straw...@astraw.com wrote:
I just installed gs on one of the buildbots -- so at least the .pdf
generation should get tested on one machine. (The one running the py24
and py25 tests.)
The OSX build bot has been down ever since the build machine was
Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
Andrew Straw straw...@astraw.com writes:
This test function is a generator that nose will then generate two test
cases out of. So, perhaps the image_comparison decorator could be
changed to become a generator? I'm not 100% sure it will work, but I
don't see why
Andrew Straw straw...@astraw.com writes:
This test function is a generator that nose will then generate two test
cases out of. So, perhaps the image_comparison decorator could be
changed to become a generator? I'm not 100% sure it will work, but I
don't see why it won't. If it does work, I
Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
Jouni K. Seppänen j...@iki.fi writes:
I committed something based on this, and a new rc parameter
savefig.extension that sets the filename extension when you call savefig
with a bare filename. The pdf tests seem to be working, at least for me,
but I am sure that
Andrew Straw straw...@astraw.com writes:
Thus, the call to savefig() would continue not to explicitly set the
extension. I've quickly modified the source to reflect my idea, but I
haven't had a chance to flesh it out or test it. It should show the
idea, though. See attached.
I committed
Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
Andrew Straw straw...@astraw.com writes:
Michael Droettboom wrote:
We can probably standardize the version of gs on the buildbot machines,
but it's been very useful up to now to have tests that can run on a
variety of developer machines as well.
Andrew Straw straw...@astraw.com writes:
Jouni - I don't think this would be hard to add, but I'm swamped at
work. If this is an itch you'd like to scratch, feel free to hack away
on the image_comparison() function in
lib/matplotlib/testing/decorators.py -- it's a pretty straightforward
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Jouni K. Seppänen j...@iki.fi wrote:
Andrew Straw straw...@astraw.com writes:
Jouni - I don't think this would be hard to add, but I'm swamped at
work. If this is an itch you'd like to scratch, feel free to hack away
on the image_comparison() function in
John Hunter jdh2...@gmail.com writes:
pyplot.savefig('foo1')
Take a look at the pyplot switch_backends function.
Yes, that function was on the next line after the part you quoted. :-)
It calls matplotlib.use with warn=False, but that function ends up doing
nothing.
Alternatively, agg
Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
John Hunter jdh2...@gmail.com writes:
pyplot.savefig('foo1')
Take a look at the pyplot switch_backends function.
Yes, that function was on the next line after the part you quoted. :-)
It calls matplotlib.use with warn=False, but that function
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Andrew Straw straw...@astraw.com wrote:
Sorry, I should have been more clear. I was thinking that the
image_compare() decorator would call the test function multiple times,
having switched the backend between invocations. Thus, the call to
savefig() would
John Hunter wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Andrew Straw straw...@astraw.com wrote:
Sorry, I should have been more clear. I was thinking that the
image_compare() decorator would call the test function multiple times,
having switched the backend between invocations. Thus, the call
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Andrew Straw straw...@astraw.com wrote:
John Hunter wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Andrew Straw straw...@astraw.com wrote:
Sorry, I should have been more clear. I was thinking that the
image_compare() decorator would call the test function multiple
John Hunter wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Andrew Straw straw...@astraw.com wrote:
John Hunter wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Andrew Straw straw...@astraw.com wrote:
Sorry, I should have been more clear. I was thinking that the
image_compare() decorator
I am thinking about adding pdf comparison ability to compare_images. One
simple way to do this would be to convert pdf files to pngs using
Ghostscript: if we store reference pdf files, and both the reference
file and the result of the test are converted using with exactly the
same version of gs,
Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
I am thinking about adding pdf comparison ability to compare_images. One
simple way to do this would be to convert pdf files to pngs using
Ghostscript: if we store reference pdf files, and both the reference
file and the result of the test are converted using with
Michael Droettboom wrote:
Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
I am thinking about adding pdf comparison ability to compare_images. One
simple way to do this would be to convert pdf files to pngs using
Ghostscript: if we store reference pdf files, and both the reference
file and the result of the
Andrew Straw straw...@astraw.com writes:
Michael Droettboom wrote:
We can probably standardize the version of gs on the buildbot machines,
but it's been very useful up to now to have tests that can run on a
variety of developer machines as well.
I understood Jouni's idea to be to save
20 matches
Mail list logo
