David Cournapeau wrote:
> Eric Firing wrote:
>> There is a clip function in all three numeric packages, so a native
>> clip is being used.
>>
>> If numpy.clip is actually slower than your version, that sounds like a
>> problem with the implementation in numpy. By all logic a single clip
>> func
Hi folks-
I'd like to report a possible way for OS X mpl users to use Apple's freetype2
(in their X11), to see if there are any problems with it I may need to be
aware of, and if not, to offer it as a possible solution to others installing
mpl from source on OS X. I know Apple's freetype2 was "b
> "Jeff" == Jeff Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeff> Is it possible to have gradients in the bar graphs made by
Jeff> matplotlib? I couldn't find anything about it in the user
Jeff> guide.
Here is some example code form the mailing list
To: Christopher Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Is it possible to have gradients in the bar graphs made by matplotlib? I
couldn't find anything about it in the user guide.
Thanks
Jeff
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay pa
Pierre,
Offhand, it looks like it should go into ticker.py, so I will probably
do that.
Eric
Pierre GM wrote:
> On Monday 18 December 2006 13:29, David L Goldsmith wrote:
>> Simson Garfinkel wrote:
>>> It really depends on your audience as to whether or not 1,000,000
>>> through 9,000,000 is be
On Monday 18 December 2006 13:29, David L Goldsmith wrote:
> Simson Garfinkel wrote:
> > It really depends on your audience as to whether or not 1,000,000
> > through 9,000,000 is better displayed in scientific notation or not.
> > For audiences that I frequently present to, any scientific notation
Simson Garfinkel wrote:
> Well, I come from the United States, where we basically ignore
> international standards and let the rest of the world do what it
> wants. Except when it annoys us.
>
Insert wink or smiley face here to signify irony, yes?
> However, there is something called an inte
yardbird wrote:
> On Saturday 16 December 2006 19:42, Xavier Gnata wrote:
>> Each time I'm working on C++ codes using vector or valarray, I would
>> like to be able to plot them.
> you should really check out the Boost::Python libraries. They allow you,
> among
> other things, to expose your C+
Simson Garfinkel wrote:
> It really depends on your audience as to whether or not 1,000,000
> through 9,000,000 is better displayed in scientific notation or not.
> For audiences that I frequently present to, any scientific notation
> is just unacceptable. You can add quantifiers (like KBps,
I wonder: how hard would it be to add some intelligence to the
interpreter and/or exception handler such that if the manner of (mis)use
of one of these implied that what the programmer meant was the other,
then the error message would say something like "Perhaps you meant to
use axis (or axes,
Well, I come from the United States, where we basically ignore
international standards and let the rest of the world do what it
wants. Except when it annoys us.
However, there is something called an internationalization which
tells clever programmers who use it what to use as a digits separa
On Sunday 17 December 2006 20:06, Eric Firing wrote:
> John Hunter wrote:
> [...]
>
> > Simson> To answer Eric's most recent posting:
> >
> > Simson> 1. I think that scientific notation should not be the
> > Simson> default, unless numbers exceed 1E+7.
> >
> > I agree with this -- scien
On 18/12/06, Simson Garfinkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It really depends on your audience as to whether or not 1,000,000
> through 9,000,000 is better displayed in scientific notation or not.
> For audiences that I frequently present to, any scientific notation
> is just unacceptable. You can a
On Saturday 16 December 2006 19:42, Xavier Gnata wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Each time I'm working on C++ codes using vector or valarray, I would
> like to be able to plot them.
> The problem is that there is no straitforward way to do that in C++.
> My goal is not to code a QT or GTK application but only to
It really depends on your audience as to whether or not 1,000,000
through 9,000,000 is better displayed in scientific notation or not.
For audiences that I frequently present to, any scientific notation
is just unacceptable. You can add quantifiers (like KBps, MBps,
GBps), but presenting so
On Saturday 16 December 2006 20:00, Simson Garfinkel wrote:
> 1. I think that scientific notation should not be the default, unless
> numbers exceed 1E+7.
There are good reasons to use scientific notation for smaller numbers than
10e+-7: We dont want neighboring tick labels to run into each other
16 matches
Mail list logo
