Re: [Matplotlib-users] Build failure

2013-10-28 Thread Ian Thomas
On 26 October 2013 09:02, Nils Wagner wrote: > The problem persists in master. > > > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Nils Wagner wrote: > >> You are right. >> The first one fails, the second works for me. >> >> >> Nils >> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote: >> >

Re: [Matplotlib-users] Build failure

2013-10-26 Thread Nils Wagner
The problem persists in master. On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Nils Wagner wrote: > You are right. > The first one fails, the second works for me. > > > Nils > > > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Michael Droettboom wrote: > >> I wonder if it's commit 6b827cbf. >> >> Can you do: >> >>

[Matplotlib-users] Build failure

2013-08-30 Thread Nils Wagner
Hi all, I cannot build the latest matplotlib from git. The build log is attached. Nils build.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data -- Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! Discover

Re: [Matplotlib-users] Build failure

2013-08-30 Thread Michael Droettboom
I wonder if it's commit 6b827cbf. Can you do: git checkout 6b827cbf python setup.py build # confirm it fails git checkout 6b827cbf^ python setup.py build # Does this work? Mike On 08/30/2013 01:06 PM, Nils Wagner wrote: Hi Michael, Thank you for your note. If I remember co

Re: [Matplotlib-users] Build failure

2013-08-30 Thread Michael Droettboom
It looks like a version mismatch with PyCXX. Was it recently updated or changed? What version of PyCXX do you have? What was the last version of matplotlib that worked for you? You can force matplotlib to use its local copy of PyCXX by uninstalling PyCXX, or adding the following lines to th

Re: [Matplotlib-users] Build failure of SVN8415 on Solaris 10 SPARC

2010-07-02 Thread John Hunter
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 8:25 AM, John Hunter wrote: > This issue is new and not related to the issue on the cookbook, I'm > pretty sure.  I have the same problem on my box at work, and it was > introduced when I upgraded to CXX6.  I have spent some time on it but > haven't found the fix yet.  I g

Re: [Matplotlib-users] Build failure of SVN8415 on Solaris 10 SPARC

2010-06-29 Thread John Hunter
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Eric Firing wrote: >> Do you have access to Sun SPARC hardware? If not, I can almost certainly >> arrange >> access to a Sun T5240 (16 core) at the University of Washington for a serious >> matplotlib developer. > > Dave, > > Thanks, but much as I would like to s

Re: [Matplotlib-users] Build failure of SVN8415 on Solaris 10 SPARC

2010-06-11 Thread Eric Firing
On 06/11/2010 03:24 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > On 06/11/10 10:28 PM, Eric Firing wrote: >> On 06/11/2010 10:54 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: >>> The latest stable (0.99.3) matplotlib builds ok on Solaris 10 03/05 on >>> SPARC. >>> >>> However, your latest trunc release has some useful fixes, so i

Re: [Matplotlib-users] Build failure of SVN8415 on Solaris 10 SPARC

2010-06-11 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 06/11/10 10:28 PM, Eric Firing wrote: > On 06/11/2010 10:54 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: >> The latest stable (0.99.3) matplotlib builds ok on Solaris 10 03/05 on SPARC. >> >> However, your latest trunc release has some useful fixes, so it was >> downloaded >> by a fellow Sage devloper. However,

Re: [Matplotlib-users] Build failure of SVN8415 on Solaris 10 SPARC

2010-06-11 Thread Eric Firing
On 06/11/2010 10:54 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > The latest stable (0.99.3) matplotlib builds ok on Solaris 10 03/05 on SPARC. > > However, your latest trunc release has some useful fixes, so it was downloaded > by a fellow Sage devloper. However, when I try to build this version on a Sun > Blade

[Matplotlib-users] Build failure of SVN8415 on Solaris 10 SPARC

2010-06-11 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
The latest stable (0.99.3) matplotlib builds ok on Solaris 10 03/05 on SPARC. However, your latest trunc release has some useful fixes, so it was downloaded by a fellow Sage devloper. However, when I try to build this version on a Sun Blade 1000 running Solaris 10 03/05, it presents a problem: