Axel Gembe wrote:
> Hi, I need to know why the attached code works in one case and takes
> forever to run in the other one.
> I don't think I've done anything wrong and I tried everything that
> came to my mind now.
> If you use "x1 = mu + sigma * np.random.randn(1000)" instead of "x1 =
> np.arr
Hi, I need to know why the attached code works in one case and takes
forever to run in the other one.
I don't think I've done anything wrong and I tried everything that came
to my mind now.
If you use "x1 = mu + sigma * np.random.randn(1000)" instead of "x1 =
np.array([np.float64(val / 2.0) for
