Well, step by step it goes.
So, I realized that for "normal" behaviour, all axeses should have same y
limit, but i need different, so there should be certain way to calculate
differente num values for aspect ratio for every axes based on ylim value.
But i hope there is more easier way to do that?
Hi again,
I think I am very near to discover how the things work, but I need a bit or
ur help. What I basically want is to apply the same aspect ratio to all
Axes objects. I realized that whenevr twinx is called, a new axes is added
in the list of axeses. So, my question is now, why when I set asp
Hi all guys,
I have already spent a lot of time trying to figure out how to set the
aspect ratio of all axeses in my plot which consists of a single subplot
and three y axes. Namely, i tried to set the aspect ratio of the base axes,
and i expect after twinx that others will inheritt that. So, what
So I switched to axes_grid1 and got things working. Thanks.
--
R. Padraic Springuel
Research Assistant
Department of Physics and Astronomy
University of Maine
Bennett 309
Office Hours: By Appointment Only
--
The Palm PD
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:21 AM, R. Padraic Springuel
wrote:
> Things I've tried:
> Adding a size keyword argument to the set_xlabel and set_ylabel commands
> (both numerical and keywords). No errors are raised, but nothing is
> changed on the plot.
>
> Adding host.axis["left"].set_size(24) and
>
I'm creating a twined axes figure and have run into a problem. I need
to increase the font size of all the text on the plot, but nothing I do
seems to work.
Here's the code I have to generate the plot:
> fig = figure()
> host = HostAxes(fig,[0.08, 0.1, 0.82, 0.83])
> par = ParasiteA
On Sunday 16 November 2008, John Hunter said something like:
> When you share an axis, the formatters and locators are shared as
> well. I'm not sure if this is idea, but this is the way it is. If
> you want to turn off the tick labels for ax2, the trick is to make
> them invisible, because the t
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Joshua J. Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In opening: Thank you very much to Stan West and John Hunter for their
> help so far.
>
> OK, I've hit either a genuine bug in Matplotlib, or a serious gap in my
> understanding; probably the latter. If I missed somethi